atomic-desktops/tracker
17
4
Fork 0
Code Issues 47 Pull requests Activity

Setup CI on the repo in the new forge #114

New issue
Closed
opened 2026-05-07 16:22:46 +00:00 by siosm · 9 comments
siosm commented 2026-05-07 16:22:46 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

As we lost CI on pagure.io (ci/tickets#544 / releng/tickets#13222), we moved the config repo to https://forge.fedoraproject.org/atomic-desktops/config.

However we don't have a full replacement for the (limited) CI that existed before.

As we lost CI on pagure.io (https://forge.fedoraproject.org/ci/tickets/issues/544 / https://forge.fedoraproject.org/releng/tickets/issues/13222), we moved the config repo to https://forge.fedoraproject.org/atomic-desktops/config. However we don't have a full replacement for the (limited) CI that existed before. - Getting Forgejo runners: - ~~https://forge.fedoraproject.org/forge/forge/issues/364~~ - ~~https://forge.fedoraproject.org/forge/forge/issues/562~~ - [x] https://forge.fedoraproject.org/forge/forge/issues/563 - ~~https://forge.fedoraproject.org/forge/forge/issues/564~~ - We use Testing Farm now - Getting an organization on the staging forge: - [x] https://forge.fedoraproject.org/forge/forge/issues/546 - Test repo: https://forge.stg.fedoraproject.org/atomic-desktops/config-ci-test - Using testing farm with existing Forgejo runners: - [x] https://forge.fedoraproject.org/atomic-desktops/config/pulls/757 -> https://forge.fedoraproject.org/atomic-desktops/config/pulls/767 - Relies on https://forge.fedoraproject.org/forge/forge/issues/568 as this will block a runner slot for the entire duration of the job. - List of available composes for testing-farm jobs: https://api.testing-farm.io/v0.2/composes/public - Konflux: - Setting up a releng owned service account for Konflux: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/releng/tickets/issues/13341 - Requesting an new group to get an email alias in the meantime
siosm commented 2026-05-07 16:24:06 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

In the mean time, PRs to the right branch in https://github.com/travier/fedora-atomic-desktops-devel should get us some form of CI / build testing.

In the mean time, PRs to the right branch in https://github.com/travier/fedora-atomic-desktops-devel should get us some form of CI / build testing.
siosm commented 2026-05-13 22:04:10 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Testing runners in the staging repo: https://forge.stg.fedoraproject.org/atomic-desktops/config-ci-test

Testing runners in the staging repo: https://forge.stg.fedoraproject.org/atomic-desktops/config-ci-test
siosm commented 2026-06-02 08:56:17 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

We now have compose build tests using testing-farm:

We now have compose build tests using testing-farm: - https://forge.fedoraproject.org/atomic-desktops/config/pulls/767 - https://forge.fedoraproject.org/atomic-desktops/config/pulls/769 - https://forge.fedoraproject.org/atomic-desktops/config/pulls/770
siosm commented 2026-06-10 13:37:50 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

With the improvements from forge/forge#568 and atomic-desktops/config#776, we have good parallel runs now.

With the improvements from https://forge.fedoraproject.org/forge/forge/issues/568 and https://forge.fedoraproject.org/atomic-desktops/config/pulls/776, we have good parallel runs now.
lenkaseg commented 2026-07-07 10:32:53 +00:00
Copy link

Hi @siosm, do you still need these?

Or is it covered by the TestingFarm dispatch?

Hi @siosm, do you still need these? - unprivileged aarch64 runner [forge/forge#562](https://forge.fedoraproject.org/forge/forge/issues/562) - privileged x86_64 runner https://forge.fedoraproject.org/forge/forge/issues/564 Or is it covered by the TestingFarm dispatch?
siosm commented 2026-07-09 15:03:38 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Hey @lenkaseg. I think we are good right now with the Testing Farm setup so we can close them. We'll ask again if it turns out that's not enough. Thanks for the work on this!

Hey @lenkaseg. I think we are good right now with the Testing Farm setup so we can close them. We'll ask again if it turns out that's not enough. Thanks for the work on this!
siosm commented 2026-07-09 15:11:58 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Let's mark this one as done for now. We can track the Konflux part in #91.

Let's mark this one as done for now. We can track the Konflux part in https://forge.fedoraproject.org/atomic-desktops/tracker/issues/91.
siosm closed this issue 2026-07-09 15:11:58 +00:00
lenkaseg commented 2026-07-09 21:32:41 +00:00
Copy link

Alright! The infra is created so in case you'd need them in the future, it should be a matter of a moment.
Currently there is one privileged aarch64 runner for atomic-desktops org on production instance and on staging as well. Do you want to keep those for experiments or should I remove them?

Alright! The infra is created so in case you'd need them in the future, it should be a matter of a moment. Currently there is one privileged aarch64 runner for atomic-desktops org on production instance and on staging as well. Do you want to keep those for experiments or should I remove them?
hricky commented 2026-07-09 21:43:32 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Please don't remove the runners from the staging instance. Thanks!

Please don't remove the runners from the staging instance. Thanks!
👍 1
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
main
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels   
docs
Related to the documentation or needs documentation

  
kind
bug
 Bug

  
kind
enhancement
 Enhancement

  
kind
package-request
 New package request

  
release
f40
 Related to or impacting Fedora 40

  
release
f41
 Related to or impacting Fedora 41

  
release
f42
 Related to or impacting Fedora 42

  
release
f43
 Related to or impacting Fedora 43

  
release
f44
 Related to or impacting Fedora 44

  
release
f45
 Related to or impacting Fedora 45

  
release/rawhide
Related to or impacting Fedora Rawhide

  
upstream
Issue should be filed upstream

No labels
docs
kind
bug
kind
enhancement
kind
package-request
release
f40
release
f41
release
f42
release
f43
release
f44
release
f45
release/rawhide
upstream
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
atomic-desktops/tracker#114
No description provided.