Reconsider adding abrt to all Atomic Desktops #30

New issue

Closed

opened 2024-05-23 09:51:50 +00:00 by Siosm · 3 comments

Siosm commented

2024-05-23 09:51:50 +00:00

(Migrated from gitlab.com)

With dnf likely coming back to Atomic Desktops (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNFAndBootcInImageModeFedora), we can reconsider adding abrt as well to let user report crashes to Fedora.

I don't have the context behind why this was excluded beyond the dnf dependency. Maybe something around support for Flatpaks.

See:

But that should not block us from adding it back.

With dnf likely coming back to Atomic Desktops (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNFAndBootcInImageModeFedora), we can reconsider adding abrt as well to let user report crashes to Fedora. I don't have the context behind why this was excluded beyond the dnf dependency. Maybe something around support for Flatpaks. See: - https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/130 - https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/1222 - https://github.com/abrt/abrt/issues/1196 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1417572 - https://github.com/fedora-silverblue/issue-tracker/issues/283 But that should not block us from adding it back.

👍 1

tpopela_rh commented

2024-05-27 08:22:02 +00:00

(Migrated from gitlab.com)

changed the description