Clean up fedora-ci-admins membership #573

Open
opened 2026-07-17 22:47:06 +00:00 by adamwill · 2 comments
Owner

While working on docs, I noticed the membership of https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/group/fedora-ci-admins/ seems a bit messy. There are plenty of folks there who I think don't actually do admin on Fedora CI any more, including e.g. @tflink . Best security principles are to drop people from such groups who don't actively need the permissions.

While working on docs, I noticed the membership of https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/group/fedora-ci-admins/ seems a bit messy. There are plenty of folks there who I think don't actually do admin on Fedora CI any more, including e.g. @tflink . Best security principles are to drop people from such groups who don't actively need the permissions.
Owner

Definitely a 👍from me, although we don't use that membership in anything significant these days other than forge here. Would be useful if we need to use it though.

@lachmanfrantisek @mvadkert

Definitely a 👍from me, although we don't use that membership in anything significant these days other than forge here. Would be useful if we need to use it though. @lachmanfrantisek @mvadkert
lecris added this to the Board project 2026-07-18 02:02:46 +00:00
Author
Owner

Ah OK. I wasn't quite sure whether it was still used for Jenkins admin privileges, since the Jenkins instance isn't deployed through infra ansible I don't know where to look for how it's configured.

Ah OK. I wasn't quite sure whether it was still used for Jenkins admin privileges, since the Jenkins instance isn't deployed through infra ansible I don't know where to look for how it's configured.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
ci/tickets#573
No description provided.