Try another structure for the CPE doc
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@pingoured.fr>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e1f0659b7d
commit
1345c92229
8 changed files with 534 additions and 139 deletions
|
|
@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
|
|||
* xref:mission_statement.adoc[The CPE Team Mission]
|
||||
* xref:working_with_us.adoc[Working with Community Platform Engineering]
|
||||
* xref:working_with_us.adoc[Working with CPE]
|
||||
** xref:day_to_day_fedora.adoc[Day to day in Fedora]
|
||||
** xref:day_to_day_centos.adoc[Day to day in CentOS]
|
||||
** xref:initiatives.adoc[Initiatives]
|
||||
** xref:sle.adoc[SLE]
|
||||
*** xref:sle_services.adoc[Services]
|
||||
* xref:about.adoc[About the Team]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
44
modules/cpe/pages/about.adoc
Normal file
44
modules/cpe/pages/about.adoc
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
|
|||
= About the team
|
||||
|
||||
In 2017 the Fedora Engineering team merged with the CentOS Engineering team
|
||||
to form what is now called the Community Platform Engineering (CPE) team.
|
||||
|
||||
For the team members, the day to day work did not change much.
|
||||
|
||||
The members working on Fedora are still fully dedicated to work on the
|
||||
Fedora Project, and those working on CentOS are still fully dedicated to
|
||||
CentOS. On both projects its members are involved in infrastructure, release
|
||||
engineering, and design. However, it brought the two infrastructures and
|
||||
teams closer to each other, allowing for more collaboration between them.
|
||||
|
||||
There are 20 people on this consolidated team. The breakdown looks like this:
|
||||
|
||||
* In Fedora:
|
||||
|
||||
** 3 dedicated system administrators
|
||||
** 5 dedicated developers
|
||||
** 1 doing both development and system administration
|
||||
** 1 doing both release engineering and system administration
|
||||
** 1 person dedicated to Fedora CoreOS
|
||||
** 2 release engineers
|
||||
** 1 person dedicated to documentation
|
||||
** 1 designer
|
||||
|
||||
* In CentOS:
|
||||
** 1 system administrator
|
||||
** 2 doing both development and system administration
|
||||
** 1 dedicated to the build systems
|
||||
|
||||
* There is also one additional person working on projects internal to Red Hat
|
||||
|
||||
As you can see this team is both quite diverse as well as limited. For
|
||||
example, we do not have dedicated database adminstrators or network engineers
|
||||
even though most of our application is one or the other when not both.
|
||||
|
||||
For these reasons we need to be careful on how our limited resources are
|
||||
spent. The team has therefore defined a xref:mission_statement.adoc[Mission
|
||||
Statement] for itself, allowing to focus its work in certain areas.
|
||||
|
||||
We have also written a document explaining xref:working_with_us.adoc[How to
|
||||
work with us] for small and large tasks. Following this document makes it
|
||||
easier for us to help you.
|
||||
8
modules/cpe/pages/day_to_day_centos.adoc
Normal file
8
modules/cpe/pages/day_to_day_centos.adoc
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
|
|||
= Working with Community Platform Engineering in CentOS
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
This document explains how to efficiently work with the CPE team.
|
||||
Your close attention to this document will help both you and us
|
||||
do the work you are asking us to do.
|
||||
|
||||
`This document is a work in progress and should be updated soon`.
|
||||
110
modules/cpe/pages/day_to_day_fedora.adoc
Normal file
110
modules/cpe/pages/day_to_day_fedora.adoc
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
|
|||
= Working with Community Platform Engineering in Fedora
|
||||
|
||||
This document explains how to efficiently work with the CPE team.
|
||||
Your close attention to this document will help both you and us
|
||||
do the work you are asking us to do.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
== Our Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
0. Is your issue/problem related to security of an application or service we run?
|
||||
-> send email to infra-security@fedoraproject.org
|
||||
|
||||
1. Is your issue/problem urgent? (A important service is down, you need a change asap)
|
||||
or IS your issue/problem such that you cannot file a ticket (authentication, no account, ticketing system down)
|
||||
-> on irc /join #fedora-admin and say '.oncall' and explain the issue to the oncall person.
|
||||
-> If no answer or the oncall person asks you to: go to next step.
|
||||
|
||||
2. File a ticket in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues/ with as much information
|
||||
as you think will be needed to handle your issue. This initial ticket will be made in the
|
||||
'Needs review' state. Please note if there is a deadline or this issue blocks you.
|
||||
-> your ticket will be reviewed within 48 hours. (usually sooner)
|
||||
-> There is no need to ping team members or notify us about the newly filed ticket.
|
||||
|
||||
3. your ticket will be triaged by a team member and moved to a new state:
|
||||
-> If it's moved to 'Waiting on asignee' it's waiting for a team member to start work on it.
|
||||
-> If it's moved to 'Waiting on reporter' it means that you need to answer questions posed in the ticket before it can be worked on.
|
||||
-> If the ticket is closed with 'initiative', See xref:initiatives.adoc[New Initiative Workflow]
|
||||
-> If the ticket is otherwise closed, it will be with a explaination from a team member.
|
||||
|
||||
4. If you have an update to your issue/task or want to know when it might be worked on:
|
||||
-> comment in the ticket adding that information or asking for timeframe.
|
||||
|
||||
5. When someone is available, your ticket will be assigned to someone to work on.
|
||||
-> Watch for progress reports/ticket being marked done.
|
||||
|
||||
6. If the work is not fully completed as required, please re-open the ticket and indicate this.
|
||||
-> go back to step 5 for additional work.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
== The oncall role in our team
|
||||
|
||||
Weekly a team member will be designated “oncall”. You can find this
|
||||
person on IRC by using '.oncall' in any of our various IRC channels.
|
||||
When available, this person:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Accepts urgent work items for the team, for example a important
|
||||
or high SLE service is down or causing issues. A ticket should
|
||||
be filed by the reporter or the oncall to track this work in any case.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Shields other team members from distracting pings and less
|
||||
urgent tickets, deciding when an issue is important enough to
|
||||
interrupt another team member.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Triages incoming tickets for urgent items that need work outside
|
||||
of normal triage process.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
== Initiatives
|
||||
|
||||
All tasks involving new applications, major deployments, major development work
|
||||
or the like will be asked to follow the xref:initiatives.adoc[New Initiative
|
||||
Workflow]. It will then be scoped and prioritized from there.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
== General Ticket Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
Please provide as much information as you can in your ticket to avoid
|
||||
back and forth for information. If you know your issue is going to
|
||||
cause a lot of discussion, start a mailing list thread for that.
|
||||
|
||||
Make sure your ticket:
|
||||
|
||||
* explains the problem or issue you are having, with URLs where
|
||||
possible to the services or applications involved.
|
||||
* tells us how important or urgent this is to you.
|
||||
* includes any error messages or output you see.
|
||||
|
||||
It's up to you as ticket filer to follow your ticket, provide information
|
||||
that is asked for and keep us aware of any urgency you may have, do not
|
||||
simply file and forget your ticket.
|
||||
|
||||
Your ticket may take a while to process, depending on the work
|
||||
that the team has and how important we think it is. If your ticket
|
||||
is blocking you, make sure you note that in the ticket but keep in
|
||||
mind that we may be working on tickets that are blocking more people.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
== IRC
|
||||
|
||||
IRC is a great way to communicate, but please do not ping team members directly.
|
||||
Instead, update your ticket with any new information you have and when the
|
||||
team member(s) working on that issue have time/availability they may contact
|
||||
you on IRC for more interactive debugging/testing.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
== Direct emails
|
||||
|
||||
Email is also a great communication method, but if you mail work items or
|
||||
information to one person directly, they cannot easily hand off the issue,
|
||||
you must wait for them to have time to address the issue (when others could
|
||||
perhaps have already solved it, etc). So, please avoid direct emails and instead
|
||||
update tickets with any information you want to add.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
== RFC 1149
|
||||
|
||||
link:https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1149[Pidgeons are too slow] for most work
|
||||
items, instead update tickets.
|
||||
|
||||
Thank you for reading this entire document!
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,43 +1,53 @@
|
|||
= The Community Platform Engineering Team
|
||||
|
||||
In 2017 the Fedora Engineering team merged with the CentOS Engineering team
|
||||
to form what is now called the Community Platform Engineering (CPE) team.
|
||||
For the team members, the day to day work did not change much.
|
||||
The Community Platform Engineering Team (CPE) is a Red Hat team dedicated
|
||||
to the Fedora and CentOS projects where they contribute to the infrastructure
|
||||
and release engineering.
|
||||
|
||||
The members working on Fedora are still fully dedicated to work on the
|
||||
Fedora Project, and those working on CentOS are still fully dedicated to
|
||||
CentOS. On both projects its members are involved in infrastructure, release
|
||||
engineering, and design. However, it brought the two infrastructures and
|
||||
teams closer to each other, allowing for more collaboration between them.
|
||||
|
||||
There are 20 people on this consolidated team. The breakdown looks like this:
|
||||
== Our Mission
|
||||
|
||||
* In Fedora:
|
||||
Our mission rests on three axes:
|
||||
|
||||
** 3 dedicated system administrators
|
||||
** 5 dedicated developers
|
||||
** 1 doing both development and system administration
|
||||
** 1 doing both release engineering and system administration
|
||||
** 1 person dedicated to Fedora CoreOS
|
||||
** 2 release engineers
|
||||
** 1 person dedicated to documentation
|
||||
** 1 designer
|
||||
.Our Mission
|
||||
[#img-mission]
|
||||
[caption="Figure 1: "]
|
||||
image::our_missions.jpg[Our Mission,500,500]
|
||||
|
||||
* In CentOS:
|
||||
** 1 system administrator
|
||||
** 2 doing both development and system administration
|
||||
** 1 dedicated to the build systems
|
||||
* **Infrastructure**: To provide power and ping to the different systems that
|
||||
are used by our community.
|
||||
* **Application maintenance**: For the applications that we maintain, we work
|
||||
on bug fixes, new features and community development.
|
||||
* **Initiatives**: For a limited time and scope we dedicate some of our
|
||||
engineers and adminstrators to initiatives deemed important and beneficial to
|
||||
the communities we are involved in.
|
||||
|
||||
* There is also one additional person working on projects internal to Red Hat
|
||||
One of the key challenges this team faces is balancing these three axes.
|
||||
For this reason, we worked on the following Mission Statement.
|
||||
|
||||
As you can see this team is both quite diverse as well as limited. For
|
||||
example, we do not have dedicated database adminstrators or network engineers
|
||||
even though most of our application is one or the other when not both.
|
||||
== Our responsabilities
|
||||
|
||||
For these reasons we need to be careful on how our limited resources are
|
||||
spent. The team has therefore defined a xref:mission_statement.adoc[Mission
|
||||
Statement] for itself, allowing to focus its work in certain areas.
|
||||
Our responsabilities are scoped in our mission statement:
|
||||
|
||||
We have also written a document explaining xref:working_with_us.adoc[How to
|
||||
work with us] for small and large tasks. Following this document makes it
|
||||
easier for us to help you.
|
||||
=== Our Mission Statement
|
||||
|
||||
__The Community Platform Engineering Team is responsible for the
|
||||
infrastructure and services that support developing, building, and
|
||||
releasing of Fedora and CentOS platform artifacts and deliverables,
|
||||
including:__
|
||||
|
||||
* __Hosting, automating, monitoring and maintaining infrastructure components__
|
||||
* __Service monitoring and lifecycle management of services hosted within our infrastructure__
|
||||
* __Feature development for infrastructure-related initiatives__
|
||||
* __Tooling to enable all of the above__
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
=== Why a Mission Statement?
|
||||
|
||||
A mission statement means the team shares a common vision about what our
|
||||
work is or should be. It gives us clear boundaries for our work and it
|
||||
helps us having a critical view on our work (current or in the future): “Does
|
||||
this fit our mission statement?”. With this in mind we can focus on bringing
|
||||
more value to the community. In other words, we want to maximize our value and
|
||||
impact in a targeted mission rather than having limited impact on a broad
|
||||
spectrum.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
146
modules/cpe/pages/sle.adoc
Normal file
146
modules/cpe/pages/sle.adoc
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
|
|||
= Service Level Expectations
|
||||
|
||||
The CPE team does not have any agreement, or contract about the availability
|
||||
of its different services. However, we do try our best to keep the services
|
||||
running and as a result you can have some expectations as to what we will
|
||||
do to this extent.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
== Primary Business Hours
|
||||
|
||||
Fedora Infrastructure's primary business hours are aligned with the work
|
||||
schedule of Red Hat Inc. Normal hours should be seen as during Monday
|
||||
through Friday 1400 UTC to 2300 UTC with US national holidays and a 2 week
|
||||
end of year closure affecting staffing and response times.
|
||||
|
||||
Services outside of primary business hours are done on call and depend on
|
||||
the availability of staff.
|
||||
|
||||
== Roles and Responsibilities
|
||||
|
||||
=== Fedora Infrastructure to Community
|
||||
|
||||
* To have staff present and available in appropriate IRC channels to answer
|
||||
questions during primary hours.
|
||||
* To have particular staff on-call during off hours so that community
|
||||
members can contact for Critical and Important services.
|
||||
* Interact with community members with respect and courtesy.
|
||||
* Work with community members to get accurate and thorough documentation of
|
||||
incidents, problems, or feature requests.
|
||||
* When possible resolve the problem as soon as acknowledged.
|
||||
* Communicate clearly estimated resolution times.
|
||||
* Move items which can not be resolved within a reasonable time to future
|
||||
feature requests or close out.
|
||||
|
||||
=== Community Member to Fedora Infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
* Give full and detailed reports of the problem or requested service.
|
||||
* Provide clear and complete contact information and times when available.
|
||||
* Leave alternative contacts who can also be available in case of vacation
|
||||
or other emergencies.
|
||||
* When contacted by Fedora IT, respond back within 5 business days
|
||||
|
||||
=== Fedora Infrastructure to Fedora Infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
* Have a clear schedule of reachable hours.
|
||||
* Set and take regular vacation time to be rested.
|
||||
* Rotate through days on-call in IRC and tickets.
|
||||
* If adding a new service, be available outside of normal business hours to
|
||||
help debug problems.
|
||||
* Follow procedures and checklists when adding or updating services.
|
||||
* Help with regular audits of the documentation
|
||||
|
||||
== Definition of Service Priorities
|
||||
|
||||
The general design of service priorities is that of concentric circles where
|
||||
items rely on services in their own circle or a circle below them.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Critical services are ones which Fedora Infrastructure will work on 24x7
|
||||
with 52 week coverage if an unplanned outage occurs. Services will be
|
||||
configured to be highly available with an estimated planned/unplanned
|
||||
uptime of 95%. Response time should be within 1 hour.
|
||||
2. Important services are ones which Fedora Infrastructure will work to be
|
||||
available 24x7 with 50 week coverage. Response times during primary hours
|
||||
should be 1 hour and outside of it should be 4 hours.
|
||||
3. Normal services are ones which Fedora Infrastructure will work to be
|
||||
available during primary work hours. Problems outside of these hours will
|
||||
be looked at as people are available. The services may be available
|
||||
outside of these but are of a lower priority than important services.
|
||||
4. Low priority services are ones which are not critical or important for
|
||||
the primary function of Fedora Infrastructure. They will be worked on and
|
||||
looked at during primary business hours. Response times should be within
|
||||
1 business day.
|
||||
5. Third Party services are ones which Fedora Infrastructure has outsourced
|
||||
tools and services to. Uptimes, service hours, and coverage are dictated
|
||||
by the third party. Depending on the type of problem, Fedora Infrastructure
|
||||
will act as an intermediary or in the case of tools like retrace and COPR
|
||||
direct the user to talk with the service owners.
|
||||
6. Deprecated services are ones which Fedora Infrastructure are no longer
|
||||
putting resources into. This may be because the project has completed its
|
||||
mission, the upstream software is dead, or the original reasons for the
|
||||
product are available. Problems with these services will be looked at
|
||||
during primary business hours. Responses may be mostly "Will Not Fix".
|
||||
|
||||
== Limitations on Support
|
||||
|
||||
* Some services that are associated with Fedora are provided by third
|
||||
parties. Changes and outages which affect them are outside the control
|
||||
of Fedora Infrastructure.
|
||||
* Fedora Infrastructure will prioritize issues and requests that affect
|
||||
multiple people or teams over a smaller group or individual.
|
||||
* Fedora Infrastructure has limited budget and hours. Requests and features
|
||||
will be prioritized to fit within those.
|
||||
* Fedora Infrastructure is bound by the laws and regulations of the United
|
||||
States of America. This means that certain requests, changes and problems
|
||||
are outside the ability of members to deal with.
|
||||
|
||||
== Glossary
|
||||
|
||||
* **Planned outage**: A planned outage is one that is announced with enough
|
||||
time to give most user's the ability to plan around it.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Unplanned outage**: An outage that occurs suddenly without proper
|
||||
allowance for users to plan around it.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Scheduled outage**: An outage which has been scheduled to occur but may
|
||||
not have been announced with enough time for users to plan around it.
|
||||
|
||||
* **High Availability**: Systems are available during specified operating
|
||||
hours with any unplanned outages 'masked' by other tools.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Continuous Operations**: Systems are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a
|
||||
week with no scheduled outages. Unplanned outages are possible during this time.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Continuous Availability**: Systems or applications are available 24x7
|
||||
with no planned or unplanned outages. This is a combination of high
|
||||
availability and continuous operations.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Level of availability**: | Percentage | Max outage time per day | | 90% | 144.0 minutes | | 95% | 72.0 minutes | | 99% | 14.4 minutes | | 99.9% | 1.4 minutes |
|
||||
|
||||
* **Commited Hours of Availability**: Hours that an organization will have
|
||||
staff available to help deal with issues with systems, services, and
|
||||
applications. Also known as "Regular Business Hours"
|
||||
|
||||
* **Outage Hours**: Total number of hours of outage considered normal for
|
||||
calculating achieved availability.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Response Time**: The time between the users notification of the problem
|
||||
and when the help desk will begin to work on that problem.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Resolution Update**: The frequency of updates to tickets
|
||||
|
||||
== Estimated Time of Resolution:
|
||||
|
||||
By priority Levels:
|
||||
|
||||
* **Emergency**: Problems which are site wide, and affect the core functions
|
||||
of the project.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Urgent**: Problems which affect multiple functions and groups in the
|
||||
project.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Normal**: Problems which affect a single user from performing needed
|
||||
duties.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Low**: A request for service, instruction, information that has no
|
||||
immediate impact on services.
|
||||
142
modules/cpe/pages/sle_services.adoc
Normal file
142
modules/cpe/pages/sle_services.adoc
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
|
|||
= Services SLE
|
||||
|
||||
Here is the list of our services per SLE level. For memory these levels are
|
||||
presented in our xref:sle.adoc[SLE Documentation].
|
||||
|
||||
== Critical
|
||||
|
||||
* DNS
|
||||
* Bastion ssh
|
||||
* Authentication/authorization (FAS) https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/
|
||||
* Authentication/authorization (Ipsilon) https://id.fedoraproject.org
|
||||
* Configuration Management (ansible)
|
||||
* Source control (git)
|
||||
* Backups
|
||||
* DHCP/PXE
|
||||
* IPA
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
== Important
|
||||
|
||||
* Koji https://koji.fedoraproject.org
|
||||
* Bodhi https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org
|
||||
* Downloads https://dl.fedoraproject.org/
|
||||
* Fedora Souce code https://src.fedoraproject.org/
|
||||
* MirrorManager https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager
|
||||
* Nagios https://nagios.fedoraproject.org
|
||||
* HAProxy https://admin.fedoraproject.org/haproxy/proxy01
|
||||
* Postgres databases
|
||||
* Mysql databases
|
||||
* Product Definition Center https://pdc.fedoraproject.org/
|
||||
* Greenwave
|
||||
* Fedmsg
|
||||
* DataGrepper https://apps.fedoraproject.org/datagrepper/
|
||||
* Email gateway bastion.fedoraproject.org
|
||||
* Autosign
|
||||
* Composer
|
||||
* Buildhosts
|
||||
* Docker registry
|
||||
* Memcached
|
||||
* Logging
|
||||
* Basset
|
||||
* PDC
|
||||
* resultsdb
|
||||
* certgetter
|
||||
* mbs
|
||||
* odcs
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
== Normal
|
||||
|
||||
* Pagure https://pagure.io
|
||||
* CI https://ci.centos.org
|
||||
* The Mailing Lists https://lists.fedoraproject.org
|
||||
* Wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Project_Wiki
|
||||
* Documentation
|
||||
* Notifications https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications
|
||||
* Kerneltest https://apps.fedoraproject.org/kerneltest
|
||||
* Fedora InfraCloud https://fedorainfracloud.org
|
||||
* FMN
|
||||
* FAF
|
||||
* Beaker
|
||||
* Freshmaker
|
||||
* Data Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
== Low
|
||||
|
||||
* Ambassadors https://fedoraproject.org/membership-map/ambassadors.html
|
||||
* Asknot http://whatcanidoforfedora.org/
|
||||
* Badges https://badges.fedoraproject.org/
|
||||
* Blocker Bugs https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/
|
||||
* Easyfix https://fedoraproject.org/easyfix/
|
||||
* Elections https://apps.fedoraproject.org/#Elections
|
||||
* FedoCal https://apps.fedoraproject.org/#FedoCal
|
||||
* Fedora Magazine https://fedoramagazine.org/
|
||||
* Fedora People https://fedorapeople.org/
|
||||
* GeoIP https://geoip.fedoraproject.org/
|
||||
* github2fedmsg https://apps.fedoraproject.org/github2fedmsg
|
||||
* Mdapi https://apps.fedoraproject.org/mdapi/
|
||||
* Meetbot https://apps.fedoraproject.org/#Meetbot
|
||||
* Nuancier https://apps.fedoraproject.org/#Nuancier
|
||||
* Paste https://paste.fedoraproject.org
|
||||
* Release Monitoring (anitya) https://release-monitoring.org/
|
||||
* Review Status https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/
|
||||
* The Planet https://fedoraplanet.org/
|
||||
* Unbound
|
||||
* Autocloud
|
||||
* Bugyou
|
||||
* Gobby
|
||||
* Keys
|
||||
* Koschei
|
||||
* Loopabull
|
||||
* Hotness
|
||||
* OpenShift
|
||||
* statscache
|
||||
* Packages https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/
|
||||
* bugzilla2fedmsg
|
||||
* fed-image
|
||||
* zanata2fedmsg
|
||||
* secondary
|
||||
* freemedia
|
||||
* pager_server
|
||||
* bz_review
|
||||
* websites
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
== Websites
|
||||
|
||||
* fedora-web
|
||||
* fedora-budget
|
||||
* fedora-docs
|
||||
* developer
|
||||
* whatcanidoforfedora
|
||||
* membership-map
|
||||
* zanata
|
||||
* review-stats
|
||||
* fedora_owner_change
|
||||
|
||||
== Third Party
|
||||
|
||||
Outside of Fedora Infrastructure to fix.
|
||||
|
||||
* Network connectivity to PHX2/RDU2
|
||||
* FreeNode IRC https://freenode.net
|
||||
* Ask Fedora https://ask.fedoraproject.org/
|
||||
* COPR https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/
|
||||
* Retrace https://retrace.fedoraproject.org
|
||||
* Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
|
||||
* Status https://status.fedoraproject.org
|
||||
* Taskotron https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/
|
||||
* Openqa
|
||||
* Taiga https://teams.fedoraproject.org/
|
||||
|
||||
== Deprecated
|
||||
|
||||
* Torrents https://torrent.fedoraproject.org
|
||||
* Darkserver https://darkserver.fedoraproject.org/
|
||||
* PkgDB https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
|
||||
* Jenkins https://jenkins.fedorainfracloud.org/
|
||||
* summershum
|
||||
* Tagger https://apps.fedoraproject.org/tagger/
|
||||
* Taiga https://taiga.fedorainfracloud.org/
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,110 +1,41 @@
|
|||
= Working with Community Platform Engineering
|
||||
|
||||
This document explains the basic principles of working with the CPE team.
|
||||
|
||||
This document explains how to efficiently work with the CPE team.
|
||||
Your close attention to this document will help both you and us
|
||||
do the work you are asking us to do.
|
||||
The general rules are:
|
||||
|
||||
== Our Workflow
|
||||
* Do not ping a single person
|
||||
|
||||
By doing this you reduce the number of people having access to your request
|
||||
drastically, meaning, if that person is busy with something else, your
|
||||
request may take much longer to be processed.
|
||||
|
||||
* If it is not in a ticket, it did not happen
|
||||
|
||||
We need to have everything in tickets. This helps sharing knowledge within
|
||||
the team but also tracking issues and potentially find the ones that are
|
||||
recurring frequently and may thus be an indicator of something we need to
|
||||
fix.
|
||||
|
||||
Even if you have discussed something on IRC or in a corridor with someone
|
||||
in the team, you want to log the discussion and its outcome in a ticket so
|
||||
we can get back to it in 2 months or 3 when we need to investigate why this
|
||||
change was made.
|
||||
|
||||
* When you cannot open a ticket
|
||||
|
||||
There are a few cases where it is acceptable to send an email or to reach
|
||||
directly to people, for example if you cannot access or authenticate to the
|
||||
ticket tracking system :)
|
||||
|
||||
In this case, you do not want to send your email or ping a single person
|
||||
(cf the first point above).
|
||||
|
||||
- In Fedora, you can use the email: `contact` @ fedoraproject.org
|
||||
- In CentOS, you can contact the sysadmins on the `#centos-devel` channel on irc.freenode.net
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
0. Is your issue/problem related to security of an application or service we run?
|
||||
-> send email to infra-security@fedoraproject.org
|
||||
|
||||
1. Is your issue/problem urgent? (A important service is down, you need a change asap)
|
||||
or IS your issue/problem such that you cannot file a ticket (authentication, no account, ticketing system down)
|
||||
-> on irc /join #fedora-admin and say '.oncall' and explain the issue to the oncall person.
|
||||
-> If no answer or the oncall person asks you to: go to next step.
|
||||
|
||||
2. File a ticket in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues/ with as much information
|
||||
as you think will be needed to handle your issue. This initial ticket will be made in the
|
||||
'Needs review' state. Please note if there is a deadline or this issue blocks you.
|
||||
-> your ticket will be reviewed within 48 hours. (usually sooner)
|
||||
-> There is no need to ping team members or notify us about the newly filed ticket.
|
||||
|
||||
3. your ticket will be triaged by a team member and moved to a new state:
|
||||
-> If it's moved to 'Waiting on asignee' it's waiting for a team member to start work on it.
|
||||
-> If it's moved to 'Waiting on reporter' it means that you need to answer questions posed in the ticket before it can be worked on.
|
||||
-> If the ticket is closed with 'initiative', See xref:initiatives.adoc[New Initiative Workflow]
|
||||
-> If the ticket is otherwise closed, it will be with a explaination from a team member.
|
||||
|
||||
4. If you have an update to your issue/task or want to know when it might be worked on:
|
||||
-> comment in the ticket adding that information or asking for timeframe.
|
||||
|
||||
5. When someone is available, your ticket will be assigned to someone to work on.
|
||||
-> Watch for progress reports/ticket being marked done.
|
||||
|
||||
6. If the work is not fully completed as required, please re-open the ticket and indicate this.
|
||||
-> go back to step 5 for additional work.
|
||||
|
||||
== The oncall role in our team
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Weekly a team member will be designated “oncall”. You can find this
|
||||
person on IRC by using '.oncall' in any of our various IRC channels.
|
||||
When available, this person:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Accepts urgent work items for the team, for example a important
|
||||
or high SLE service is down or causing issues. A ticket should
|
||||
be filed by the reporter or the oncall to track this work in any case.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Shields other team members from distracting pings and less
|
||||
urgent tickets, deciding when an issue is important enough to
|
||||
interrupt another team member.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Triages incoming tickets for urgent items that need work outside
|
||||
of normal triage process.
|
||||
|
||||
== Initiatives
|
||||
|
||||
All tasks involving new applications, major deployments, major development work
|
||||
or the like will be asked to follow the xref:initiatives.adoc[New Initiative
|
||||
Workflow]. It will then be scoped and prioritized from there.
|
||||
|
||||
== General Ticket Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Please provide as much information as you can in your ticket to avoid
|
||||
back and forth for information. If you know your issue is going to
|
||||
cause a lot of discussion, start a mailing list thread for that.
|
||||
|
||||
Make sure your ticket:
|
||||
|
||||
* explains the problem or issue you are having, with URLs where
|
||||
possible to the services or applications involved.
|
||||
* tells us how important or urgent this is to you.
|
||||
* includes any error messages or output you see.
|
||||
|
||||
It's up to you as ticket filer to follow your ticket, provide information
|
||||
that is asked for and keep us aware of any urgency you may have, do not
|
||||
simply file and forget your ticket.
|
||||
|
||||
Your ticket may take a while to process, depending on the work
|
||||
that the team has and how important we think it is. If your ticket
|
||||
is blocking you, make sure you note that in the ticket but keep in
|
||||
mind that we may be working on tickets that are blocking more people.
|
||||
|
||||
== IRC
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
IRC is a great way to communicate, but please do not ping team members directly.
|
||||
Instead, update your ticket with any new information you have and when the
|
||||
team member(s) working on that issue have time/availability they may contact
|
||||
you on IRC for more interactive debugging/testing.
|
||||
|
||||
== Direct emails
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Email is also a great communication method, but if you mail work items or
|
||||
information to one person directly, they cannot easily hand off the issue,
|
||||
you must wait for them to have time to address the issue (when others could
|
||||
perhaps have already solved it, etc). So, please avoid direct emails and instead
|
||||
update tickets with any information you want to add.
|
||||
|
||||
== RFC 1149
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
link:https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1149[Pidgeons are too slow] for most work
|
||||
items, instead update tickets.
|
||||
|
||||
Thank you for reading this entire document!
|
||||
Both projects have their own, additional, processes for their day to day work,
|
||||
you can find them there:
|
||||
- xref:day_to_day_fedora.adoc[for Fedora]
|
||||
- xref:day_to_day_centos.adoc[for CentOS]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue