Replace Program Manager with Operations Architect #198

Merged
jflory7 merged 2 commits from foa into main 2026-06-09 01:55:39 +00:00
Contributor

The Fedora Council charter assumed the existence of a funded-by-Red-Hat Program Manager role. That position no longer exists. However, Red Hat is hiring for a new role to support Fedora. This updates our charter to include that position instead.

Please do not merge until to-be-filed-soon council ticket is resolved.

The Fedora Council charter assumed the existence of a funded-by-Red-Hat Program Manager role. That position no longer exists. However, Red Hat is hiring for a new role to support Fedora. This updates our charter to include that position instead. Please do not merge until to-be-filed-soon council ticket is resolved.
Contributor

Looks reasonable.

Looks reasonable.
Owner

Metadata Update from @jflory7:

  • Pull-request tagged with: type - existing docs
**Metadata Update from @jflory7**: - Pull-request tagged with: type - existing docs
Owner

Should we use the FPgM page as the reference for the FOA role page instead, and use an Antora page alias to redirect traffic from the old page to the new page? Or is there a strong reason that the roles should be documented separately?

If we keep both, then we probably need some clear notation on the FPgM page that the role does not exist anymore, and its figurative successor is the FOA role.

Should we use the FPgM page as the reference for the FOA role page instead, and use an Antora page alias to redirect traffic from the old page to the new page? Or is there a strong reason that the roles should be documented separately? If we keep both, then we probably need some clear notation on the FPgM page that the role does not exist anymore, and its figurative successor is the FOA role.
Contributor

I see no reason to retain the FPgM role information at this point. The role is now replaced with the Fedora Operations Architect. How the work is divided up may be different, but FPgM does not exist anymore and mentioning it going forward is only going to lead to confusion. Let's adopt the new title and use it consistently.

I see no reason to retain the FPgM role information at this point. The role is now replaced with the Fedora Operations Architect. How the work is divided up may be different, but FPgM does not exist anymore and mentioning it going forward is only going to lead to confusion. Let's adopt the new title and use it consistently.
Owner

My preference would be to overwrite the FPgM page with the Ops Architect page instead of keeping both. I recall @bcotton weighing in too, I think in the Council chat room, that he was fine with the page being updated with the new title and retaining some degree of historical reference for the past FPgMs in the new Ops Architect page.

Edit: It was on Fedora Discussion.

My preference would be to overwrite the FPgM page with the Ops Architect page instead of keeping both. I recall @bcotton weighing in too, I think in the Council chat room, that he was fine with the page being updated with the new title and retaining some degree of historical reference for the past FPgMs in the new Ops Architect page. _Edit_: It was [on Fedora Discussion](https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/fedora-council-tickets-ticket-462-council-charter-update-update-fedora-program-manager-to-fedora-operations-architect/87172/3).
Owner

Metadata Update from @jflory7:

  • Request assigned
**Metadata Update from @jflory7**: - Request assigned
Owner

1 new commit added

  • docs(council): Incorporate edits from Operations Architect onboarding
**1 new commit added** * ``docs(council): Incorporate edits from Operations Architect onboarding``
Owner

2 new commits added

  • docs(council): Incorporate edits from Operations Architect onboarding
  • docs(council): Convert Program Manager to Operations Architect
**2 new commits added** * ``docs(council): Incorporate edits from Operations Architect onboarding`` * ``docs(council): Convert Program Manager to Operations Architect``
Owner

2 new commits added

  • docs(council): Incorporate edits from Operations Architect onboarding
  • docs(council): Convert Program Manager to Operations Architect
**2 new commits added** * ``docs(council): Incorporate edits from Operations Architect onboarding`` * ``docs(council): Convert Program Manager to Operations Architect``
Owner

This Pull Request is now updated to address the feedback raised earlier (i.e. no more FPgM page) and to also fully expand the Fedora Operations Architect description. This is ready for review at the next Fedora Council meeting.

This Pull Request is now updated to address the feedback raised earlier (i.e. no more FPgM page) and to also fully expand the Fedora Operations Architect description. This is ready for review at the next Fedora Council meeting.
Owner

Discussed in 2023-10-25 Council meeting.


This was approved with six votes per Fedora-Council/tickets#462. With that in mind, I am going to merge this! 🎬

_Discussed in [2023-10-25 Council meeting](https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/council_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2023-10-25/council.2023-10-25-14.00.html)_. --- This was approved with six votes per Fedora-Council/tickets#462. With that in mind, I am going to merge this! :clapper:
Owner

rebased onto 514905ef77

rebased onto 514905ef770340f1a3423290a2bc88c114a074c8
Owner

Pull-Request has been merged by jonatoni

Pull-Request has been merged by jonatoni
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No milestone
No project
No assignees
5 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
council/docs!198
No description provided.