FMS 2026: Lunch and Learn #21
Labels
No labels
category
docs
Design
Event production
good first issue
help wanted
Marketing
?
needs changes
?
needs reporter feedback
?
needs team vote
scope
bug
scope
improvement
scope
new
Speaker management
state
blocked
state
duplicate
state
invalid
state
wontfix
category
documentation
category
events
?
needs changes
?
needs reporter feedback
?
needs team vote
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
scope
bug
scope
good first issue
scope
help wanted
scope
improvement
scope
new
state
approved
state
blocked
state
duplicate
state
invalid
state
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
6 participants
Notifications
Due date
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
dei/fedora-mentor-summit#21
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Flock includes a catered lunch for attendees, and sharing a meal is often a great way to spark conversations. During this time, we plan to organize structured networking by setting up tables that connect mentors and mentees based on shared topics of interest. This will create a space for open discussions around mentoring and related experiences. Last year this approach worked really well and helped facilitate meaningful conversations.
From last year:
From this year:
Agenda for March 17 meeting
Notes from the March 17 meeting:
Action item:
Following the discussion here and from our previous sync, I want to express my interest in working on this.
Some fast feedback from me on the menu and last year's event:
Regarding unbalanced mentor / mentees, were their too many mentors or to many mentees?
I'm not sure what to suggest since I wasn't there:) But still, I'm interested in helping with this.
As I was present in the pilot meeting for the 2026 iteration as well as in the previous iteration of the event itself, I suppose I can answer a few of the questions here.
For the first question, previously we had registrations with well-defined roles (as in people stated if they would play the part of a mentor or a mentee) and depending on that, groups were formed. We do not necessarily want to skip folks who happen to be there at the time but could not register, and as such, keep the roles dynamic in nature (that is, anyone can be a mentor or mentee like we want our community to be, anyway), and previously, we had more mentors than we had mentees when we stuck close to the folks who happened to register before.
To be honest, I am not sure if I agree completely with the second point. The "lunch and learn" format, along with the dynamic mentor/mentee role at the dining table, means that we are opening ourselves up to a wide range of conversations. We can have recommendations as we did before, in those beautifully crafted menu cards, on what people should talk about, sure - but a part of me wants this to be around the general idea of mentoring. The participants would anyway hail from certain subprojects, so they would know the direction of the conversation.
For the third point, an easy +1 to this!
For the fourth point, recommendations on how to drive conversations over what to talk about could be valuable.
For the fifth point, I suggest removing those chilli-pepper icons entirely, and instead having a general recommendation to the participants to be mindful of what they communicate. This allows folks to not subconsciously avoid those questions and yet be nice, in general.
The discussion thread with the poll was created here
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/fedora-mentor-summit-lunch-and-learn-flock-to-fedora-2026/189649
And it has been promoted on LinkedIn too, by @jflory7
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/flock2026-prague-fedoramentorsummit-share-7457724031249645568-8IhE/
Also, @gwmngilfen, will bring it up in the CLE call
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bMT5U5Nxdqb_5DOLuGgHNGMiz7ub0lnlGoprkPzGmQw/edit?tab=t.mhbgzrfzctz2#heading=h.ob5n0vmt7gaq
Notes from the April 17 meeting:
Action items:
Notes from the May 7 meeting:
Action items:
Agenda for the May 15 meeting:
Mentor/Mentee Lunch Matching 2026to FMS 2026: Lunch and LearnNotes from the May 15 meeting:
Action items:
Agenda for the May 21 meeting:
I had another look, I think it's fine as-is. I don't see anything missing from absolute basics such as "whats your backstory", "what do you work on" or "what are you excited about". I agree with @t0xic0der from earlier that dropping the "spicy" icons seems wise, they don't add anything useful.
Notes for the May 21 meeting:
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Some updates:
Agenda for the May 29 meeting:
Notes from the May 29 meeting: