F45 Change: Versioned libgit2 packages #3611

Closed
opened 2026-05-27 08:55:12 +00:00 by amoloney · 10 comments
Owner

Going forward, only fully versioned packages for libgit2 will be provided. Dependent libraries and applications are adapted to build and link with the specific libgit2 version they support, and the version-less package names will no longer be provided.

Owners, do not implement this work until the FESCo vote has explicitly ended.
The Fedora Program Manager will create a tracking bug in Bugzilla for this Change, which is your indication to proceed. See the FESCo ticket policy and the Changes policy for more information.

REMINDER: This ticket is for FESCo members to vote on the proposal. Further discussion should happen in the Discourse discussion linked above. Additional discussion may happen on the Fedora Devel mailing list.

Going forward, only fully versioned packages for libgit2 will be provided. Dependent libraries and applications are adapted to build and link with the specific libgit2 version they support, and the version-less package names will no longer be provided. * [Change proposal](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Versioned_libgit2_packages) * [devel-announce post](https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/75IEHXOQKZQQOM6XQ5VROPYCNPRQYM5I/) * [Discourse discussion](https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/189891) * Owners: @decathorpe **Owners, do not implement this work until the FESCo vote has explicitly ended.** The Fedora Program Manager will create a tracking bug in Bugzilla for this Change, which is your indication to proceed. See the [FESCo ticket policy](https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/#_ticket_policy) and the [Changes policy](https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/program_management/changes_policy/) for more information. **REMINDER**: This ticket is for FESCo members to vote on the proposal. Further discussion should happen in the Discourse discussion linked above. Additional discussion may happen on the [Fedora Devel](https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/) mailing list.
Owner

+1 here. We may want to notify/rope in the epel steering folks for comment about that part of things...

+1 here. We may want to notify/rope in the epel steering folks for comment about that part of things...
Owner

I would have filed a separate proposal with them if / when this is approved, since I don't think Change proposals cover EPEL (or ... do they?) - but FWIW @carlgeorge inspired the changes proposed here.

I would have filed a separate proposal with them if / when this is approved, since I don't think Change proposals cover EPEL (or ... do they?) - but FWIW @carlgeorge inspired the changes proposed here.
Owner

Ah, that should have been @carlwgeorge I think.

Ah, that should have been @carlwgeorge I think.
Owner

+1

+1
Owner

+1

+1
Owner

+1 (my own Change)

+1 (my own Change)
Owner

This is now APPROVED (+4, 0, -0) after 7 days.

This is now APPROVED (+4, 0, -0) after 7 days.
Owner

Metadata Update from @decathorpe:

  • Issue tagged with: pending announcement
**Metadata Update from @decathorpe**: - Issue tagged with: pending announcement
Owner
Announced: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/HKQ332NLB7YKBY6AM35PXZ6NRWVAMUI6/
Owner

Metadata Update from @decathorpe:

  • Issue untagged with: pending announcement
  • Issue close_status updated to: Accepted
  • Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
**Metadata Update from @decathorpe**: - Issue **un**tagged with: pending announcement - Issue close_status updated to: Accepted - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
5 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
fesco/tickets#3611
No description provided.