Request to become Proven Packager [mschorm] #3657

Closed
opened 2026-07-22 23:31:10 +00:00 by mschorm · 17 comments

Hello,

I, @mschorm, would like to become a Proven Packager.

My 'about me' page covers my Fedora impact - maintaining the MariaDB, MySQL stacks since 2016, and newly also ODBC stack, delivering dozen Fedora Changes, driving several updates to the Packaging Guidelines; community recognitions, and other highlights: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mschorm

Justification:

As I've gained more experience and broader responsibilities and impact in Fedora, I increasingly run into situations where Proven Packager rights would be convenient - when related changes need to land across dependent packages and maintainers aren't responding to PRs and Bugzilla needinfos.

As a leader of a @db-sig packager group, the Proven Packager powers would come handy for side-tag rebuilds we occasionally do, and after @ljavorsk (#2983) left our team, pursuing different carrier opportunity, we lost the only Proven packager we had, leaving a gap that hasn't been filled since.

Recently, I've also been taking on larger cross-cutting work - the i686 minimization effort that could affect ~3,500 packages. I'd like to personally drive that to completion, and doing so effectively would require Proven Packager access:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Q2SPZUPEK4KI4CR7K7ZCB5AQBM4RYGWK/

Prerequisites:

I believe the Fedora Changes Packaging Guidelines fixes delivered display my good understanding of the Guidelines and Fedora Linux project nature, and prove I am able to safely land even complex ecosystem changes.

I already have 2FA enabled.

Hello, I, @mschorm, would like to become a Proven Packager. My 'about me' page covers my Fedora impact - maintaining the MariaDB, MySQL stacks since 2016, and newly also ODBC stack, delivering dozen Fedora Changes, driving several updates to the Packaging Guidelines; community recognitions, and other highlights: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mschorm Justification: As I've gained more experience and broader responsibilities and impact in Fedora, I increasingly run into situations where Proven Packager rights would be convenient - when related changes need to land across dependent packages and maintainers aren't responding to PRs and Bugzilla needinfos. As a leader of a `@db-sig` packager group, the Proven Packager powers would come handy for side-tag rebuilds we occasionally do, and after @ljavorsk (https://forge.fedoraproject.org/fesco/tickets/issues/2983) left our team, pursuing different carrier opportunity, we lost the only Proven packager we had, leaving a gap that hasn't been filled since. Recently, I've also been taking on larger cross-cutting work - the i686 minimization effort that could affect ~3,500 packages. I'd like to personally drive that to completion, and doing so effectively would require Proven Packager access: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Q2SPZUPEK4KI4CR7K7ZCB5AQBM4RYGWK/ Prerequisites: I believe the Fedora Changes Packaging Guidelines fixes delivered display my good understanding of the Guidelines and Fedora Linux project nature, and prove I am able to safely land even complex ecosystem changes. I already have 2FA enabled.
Owner

+1

I have emailed the packager sponsors to invite them to vote on this ticket.

+1 I have emailed the packager sponsors to invite them to vote on this ticket.
Owner

+1

+1
Owner

+1

+1

+1 but also I don't think you should make the i686 change but I still don't think you've explained why it's useful.

+1 but also I don't think you should make the i686 change but I still don't think you've explained why it's useful.

+1 Michal has been helping me out with my backlog wrt Fedora gaming packages and has been doing a great job there (thank you Michal).

+1 Michal has been helping me out with my backlog wrt Fedora gaming packages and has been doing a great job there (thank you Michal).

+1

+1

+1

+1

+1

+1

+1

+1
Owner

Definite +1

Definite +1

+1

+1

+1

+1
Owner

+1

+1
Owner

It's been a week, I see 14 +1s and 0 -1's so this request is approved.

Use your powers wisely!

(You may need to logout and back on to src.fedoraproject.org to reflect the group membership there).

It's been a week, I see 14 +1s and 0 -1's so this request is approved. Use your powers wisely! (You may need to logout and back on to src.fedoraproject.org to reflect the group membership there).
kevin closed this issue 2026-07-30 19:21:21 +00:00
Owner

Do we need to keep this open as pending-announcement or not for PP request tickets?

Do we need to keep this open as pending-announcement or not for PP request tickets?
Owner

In the past we just closed them... but thinking about it, it might be nice to actually announce those too? Will defer to others on that...

In the past we just closed them... but thinking about it, it might be nice to actually announce those too? Will defer to others on that...
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
15 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
fesco/tickets#3657
No description provided.