fesco/tickets
13
2
Fork 1
Code Issues 19 Pull requests Activity

Non-responsive maintainer: cleber #3659

New issue
Closed
opened 2026-07-28 05:58:36 +00:00 by hpaluch-pil · 11 comments
hpaluch-pil commented 2026-07-28 05:58:36 +00:00
Copy link

FAS username of the non-responsive maintainer

cleber

Names of package(s) with unaddressed issues

python-avocado python-aexpect

Link to non-responsive maintainer bug

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2499900

Unaddressed issues

Link to list: Bug List

Individual bugs:

Link to mailing list post for the non-responsive maintainer process

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6VD2262E5T33KL4PWDJGJNZFRPO3DOH7/

Affected package co-maintainers (if any)

No response

Submitter is interested in comaintaining the package(s):

  • Yes

Additional notes

No response

This is a ticket for the Fedora's Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers.

### FAS username of the non-responsive maintainer cleber ### Names of package(s) with unaddressed issues python-avocado python-aexpect ### Link to non-responsive maintainer bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2499900 ### Unaddressed issues Link to list: [Bug List](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&columnlist=product%2Ccomponent%2Cassigned_to%2Cstatus%2Csummary%2Clast_change_time%2Cseverity%2Cpriority&email1=crosa&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&order=priority%2C%20severity%2C%20&query_format=advanced) Individual bugs: - [python-aexpect-1.8.0 is available](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2026200) - [python-aexpect: Stop using deprecated %py3_build/%py3_install macros](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2377418) - [python-avocado: Stop using deprecated %py3_build/%py3_install macros](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2377468) - [python-avocado-113.0 is available](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2432786) - [F45FailsToInstall: Multiple packages built from python-avocado](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2485762) - [python-avocado: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f45](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2504443) - [Please build an EPEL9 build for python-avocado](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2211732) - [import aexpect crashes with: No module named 'pipes' (pipes removed from python3.13+)](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2414808) ### Link to mailing list post for the non-responsive maintainer process https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6VD2262E5T33KL4PWDJGJNZFRPO3DOH7/ ### Affected package co-maintainers (if any) _No response_ ### Submitter is interested in comaintaining the package(s): - [ ] Yes ### Additional notes _No response_ This is a ticket for the Fedora's [Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers](https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/).
gotmax23 commented 2026-07-30 03:32:35 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

@crosa is not a valid FAS username.

@crosa is not a valid FAS username.
gotmax23 added the due date 2026-08-18 2026-07-30 03:32:57 +00:00
gotmax23 commented 2026-07-30 03:35:23 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

@hpaluch-pil, if you meant, @cleber, can you please change the ticket title and description accordingly?

@hpaluch-pil, if you meant, @cleber, can you please change the ticket title and description accordingly?
hpaluch-pil commented 2026-07-30 05:25:44 +00:00
Author
Copy link

@gotmax23 wrote in #3659 (comment):

@hpaluch-pil, if you meant, @cleber, can you please change the ticket title and description accordingly?

Ooops, you are right! I was confused that he has e-mail Cleber Rosa <crosa@r...m> - however now I see from https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-4ee3339f88 that he has username cleber

@gotmax23 wrote in https://forge.fedoraproject.org/fesco/tickets/issues/3659#issuecomment-1072360: > @hpaluch-pil, if you meant, @cleber, can you please change the ticket title and description accordingly? Ooops, you are right! I was confused that he has e-mail `Cleber Rosa <crosa@r...m>` - however now I see from https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-4ee3339f88 that he has username `cleber`
decathorpe changed title from Non-responsive maintainer: crosa to Non-responsive maintainer: cleber 2026-08-04 11:33:46 +00:00
decathorpe commented 2026-08-04 11:38:49 +00:00
Owner
Copy link
  • last build in koji: 2025-10-14
  • last activity in bodhi: 2025-10-14
  • last activity in src.fp.o: 2025-12-04
  • last activity on pagure.io: 2025-10-09
  • last activity on forge.fp.o: none

+1

- last build in koji: 2025-10-14 - last activity in bodhi: 2025-10-14 - last activity in src.fp.o: 2025-12-04 - last activity on pagure.io: 2025-10-09 - last activity on forge.fp.o: none +1
gotmax23 commented 2026-08-04 18:29:29 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

+1

(I set the ticket's due date to August 18, 2026, when the packages will be orphaned if we receive no response from the maintainer as per the policy)

+1 (I set the ticket's due date to August 18, 2026, when the packages will be orphaned if we receive no response from the maintainer as per the policy)
👍 1
gotmax23 modified the due date from 2026-08-18 to 2026-08-11 2026-08-10 18:35:17 +00:00
gotmax23 commented 2026-08-10 18:38:43 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Actually, I did the math wrong. The devel list post was sent over a week before the FESCo ticket was filed, so the timeline to mass orphan the nonresponsive maintainer's packages is (ticket filing date + two weeks). The packages should be mass orphaned tomorrow.

Per the non-responsive maintainer policy voting rules: APPROVED (+2, 0, 0)

Actually, I did the math wrong. The devel list post was sent over a week before the FESCo ticket was filed, so the timeline to mass orphan the nonresponsive maintainer's packages is (ticket filing date + two weeks). The packages should be mass orphaned tomorrow. --- Per the non-responsive maintainer policy voting rules: APPROVED (+2, 0, 0)
decathorpe commented 2026-08-11 10:57:28 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

The packages should be mass orphaned tomorrow.

Did you want to file a releng ticket for this?

> The packages should be mass orphaned tomorrow. Did you want to file a releng ticket for this?
hpaluch-pil commented 2026-08-11 11:57:06 +00:00
Author
Copy link

Just found that Cleber Rosa is active on GitHub (under different nick - "clebergnu" having organization RedHat, but contributing also to projects in Avocado Group).

Link: https://github.com/clebergnu

Is anyone in Fedora/RedHat able to ping him - for clarification?

Just found that Cleber Rosa is active on GitHub (under different nick - "clebergnu" having organization RedHat, but contributing also to projects in Avocado Group). Link: https://github.com/clebergnu Is anyone in Fedora/RedHat able to ping him - for clarification?
gotmax23 commented 2026-08-12 04:19:12 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

decathorpe wrote in #3659 (comment):

The packages should be mass orphaned tomorrow.

Did you want to file a releng ticket for this?

releng/tickets#13467

decathorpe wrote in https://forge.fedoraproject.org/fesco/tickets/issues/3659#issuecomment-1263448: > > The packages should be mass orphaned tomorrow. > > Did you want to file a releng ticket for this? https://forge.fedoraproject.org/releng/tickets/issues/13467
gotmax23 commented 2026-08-12 04:25:10 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

@hpaluch-pil wrote in #3659 (comment):

Just found that Cleber Rosa is active on GitHub (under different nick - "clebergnu" having organization RedHat, but contributing also to projects in Avocado Group).

Link: https://github.com/clebergnu

Is anyone in Fedora/RedHat able to ping him - for clarification?

It seems there were multiple attempts to contact them that have not succeeded, but if anybody wants to try to contact them again, that's of course welcome. Note that this process still allows the maintainer to pick up the orphaned packages via a one-click process for 6 weeks after they are first orphaned.

@hpaluch-pil wrote in https://forge.fedoraproject.org/fesco/tickets/issues/3659#issuecomment-1263489: > Just found that Cleber Rosa is active on GitHub (under different nick - "clebergnu" having organization RedHat, but contributing also to projects in Avocado Group). > > Link: https://github.com/clebergnu > > Is anyone in Fedora/RedHat able to ping him - for clarification? It seems there were multiple attempts to contact them that have not succeeded, but if anybody wants to try to contact them again, that's of course welcome. Note that this process still allows the maintainer to pick up the orphaned packages via a one-click process for 6 weeks after they are first orphaned.
gotmax23 commented 2026-08-13 02:00:06 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

This has been processed by releng --- thanks!

This has been processed by releng --- thanks!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
main
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels   
document it
A new policy/recommendation needs to be documented

  
fast track
A swift resolution is critical, +7,-0 immediately approves the ticket

  
meeting
This ticket will be on the meting agenda

  
next release
The Change was postponed to next release

  
nonresponsive maintainer
Tickets about nonresponsive maintainers

  
packager revocation
Tickets about revoking packager privileges

  
pending announcement
Approved/rejected tickets to be announced alongside the next meeting agenda

  
provenpackager
A request to become a provenpackager

  
python 2 exception
An exception request to continue to use Python 2 in Fedora 32+

  
self contained change
Tickets with Self Contained Change proposals

  
stalled
Tickets that are stalled, FESCo won't regularly triage them

  
Status
Accepted
 Ticket contains a proposal that was accepted

  
Status
Duplicate
 Ticket rejected for being a duplicate

  
Status
Insufficient data
 Ticket rejected due to insufficient information being available

  
Status
Invalid
 Ticket rejected due to being invalid or misfiled

  
Status
Rejected
 Ticket contains a proposal that was rejected

  
system wide change
Tickets with System Wide Change proposals

  
updates policy exception
Tickets for exceptions from the Updates Policy

  
vote-in-progress
Vote is currently in progress in the ticket

No labels
document it
fast track
meeting
next release
nonresponsive maintainer
packager revocation
pending announcement
provenpackager
python 2 exception
self contained change
stalled
Status
Accepted
Status
Duplicate
Status
Insufficient data
Status
Invalid
Status
Rejected
system wide change
updates policy exception
vote-in-progress
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

2026-08-11

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
fesco/tickets#3659
No description provided.