Requirements and Investigation Ticket Tracker for Fedora's Bugzilla Replacement #3664
Labels
No labels
document it
fast track
meeting
next release
nonresponsive maintainer
packager revocation
pending announcement
provenpackager
python 2 exception
self contained change
stalled
Status
Accepted
Status
Duplicate
Status
Insufficient data
Status
Invalid
Status
Rejected
system wide change
updates policy exception
vote-in-progress
No milestone
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
fesco/tickets#3664
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Fedora will need to identify a suitable replacement for Bugzilla. This ticket will serve as a high-level tracker for the progression of this work.with thi
The overall owners of this change will be FESCo, and the FOA and CLE Product Owner will work with this group to begin scoping requirements for major users of bugzilla. This is likely to include, but not limited to packagers, Fedora QA, change wrangler, and other users.
Fedora Council is expected to be kept informed of this effort via the FESCo rep, and will offer their support or guidance when needed.
A timeline for this requirements gathering and overall approx timeline for the migration will follow.
Ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Fedora_bug_tracker
This topic is on the agenda for today's meeting:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/PWMQRM2RQXWIGSQQPX643JE3ADM5Y3AC/
This was discussed during today's meeting (meeting log starting at 17:21:05). We agreed on two action items:
user stories") from any groups that currently use bugzilla (which is, essentially, all of them) and start sending out requests for those requirements.I'll mark this ticket as "stalled" for now since it is no longer immediately actionable, and will only become actionable again when the requirements gathering phase ends and the discussion period starts.
The ticket tracker is now set up (including a short README and a default ticket template):
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/fesco/rhbz-replacement-requirements
I also sent an email to devel-announce, which still needs to be ack'd as it got moderated.