Private Issues: Establish Guidelines for public/private transparency #242
Labels
No labels
Backlog Status
Needs Review
Backlog Status
Ready
Chore
points
01
points
02
points
03
points
05
points
08
points
13
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Sprint Status
Blocked
Sprint Status
Done
Sprint Status
In Progress
Sprint Status
Review
Sprint Status
To Do
Technical Debt
Work Item
Bug
Work Item
Epic
Work Item
Spike
Work Item
Task
Work Item
User Story
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Blocks
#113 Private Issues
forge/forge
Reference
forge/forge#242
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Story
As a developer implementing the “Private Issues” feature,
I need guidance on how transparent a function or method I work on needs to be,
so I can work with greater confidence.
Background
While refactoring code to cope with public vs. private issues “bottom up” (i.e. starting at the DB model and see how it ripples out), I found that I had no real idea whether a piece of code needs to transparently deal with both types, or whether the caller can be expected to specify the type, or if if should deal with only one of them (haven’t seen that in the wild yet, didn’t get far enough up in the stack I guess).
Hmm, revisiting forgejo/design#2 makes me unsure if this is the question to ask right now, looks like other more fundamental questions need clarification first.
nphilipp referenced this issue2025-11-06 11:56:44 +00:00