forge/forge
9
6
Fork 3
Code Issues 77 Pull requests 1 Projects 2 Wiki Activity Actions

Migrating Neuro-SIG #379

New issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-02 10:25:48 +00:00 by ankursinha · 8 comments
ankursinha commented 2026-02-02 10:25:48 +00:00
Copy link

Hi there,

Could we please have some help in migrating the Neuro-sig pagure repos here (if that's allowed---or should we move to GitHub/GitLab)?

Desired organisation name (Short name):
neuro-sig

Full name of the organisation:
Fedora Neuroscience SIG (NeuroFedora)

Description:
The Neuro-SIG is a set of Fedora package maintainers that focus on making neuroscience related software usable on Fedora.

Website URL:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/neurofedora/overview/

Avatar/Logo:
Attached

Fedora accounts group for organisation owners/admins:
neuro-sig-owners

Fedora accounts group for organisation members:
neuro-sig-members

Repositories entailed:

https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/NeuroFedora
https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/documentation

Upstream ticket:
https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/NeuroFedora/issue/585

Hi there, Could we please have some help in migrating the Neuro-sig pagure repos here (if that's allowed---or should we move to GitHub/GitLab)? Desired organisation name (Short name): neuro-sig Full name of the organisation: Fedora Neuroscience SIG (NeuroFedora) Description: The Neuro-SIG is a set of Fedora package maintainers that focus on making neuroscience related software usable on Fedora. Website URL: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/neurofedora/overview/ Avatar/Logo: Attached Fedora accounts group for organisation owners/admins: neuro-sig-owners Fedora accounts group for organisation members: neuro-sig-members Repositories entailed: https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/NeuroFedora https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/documentation Upstream ticket: https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/NeuroFedora/issue/585
3b852c390053c6301ccba210fd945cb72b17e1e32d128910a1f745020a40e978-NeuroFedoraLogo01.png
22 KiB
3b852c390053c6301ccba210fd945cb72b17e1e32d128910a1f745020a40e978-NeuroFedoraLogo01.png
t0xic0der added this to the Sprint 13 project 2026-02-02 10:30:44 +00:00
t0xic0der commented 2026-02-18 03:58:47 +00:00
Member
Copy link

The namespace and the associated teams (for owners and members) have been created.

I have also opened a pull request to perform the team and group mappings.

@ryanlerch, could you please create a forge-neuro-sig-owners group with the sponsors from this FAS group as both sponsors and members? Also, please create a forge-neuro-sig-members group with the aforementioned folks as sponsors there and the members of the aforementioned FAS group as members. Thanks!

The [namespace](https://forge.fedoraproject.org/neuro-sig) and the associated teams (for [owners](https://forge.fedoraproject.org/org/neuro-sig/teams/owners) and [members](https://forge.fedoraproject.org/org/neuro-sig/teams/members)) have been created. I have also opened a [pull request](https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/ansible/pulls/3116) to perform the team and group mappings. @ryanlerch, could you please create a `forge-neuro-sig-owners` group with the sponsors from this [FAS group](https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/group/neuro-sig/) as both sponsors and members? Also, please create a `forge-neuro-sig-members` group with the aforementioned folks as sponsors there and the members of the aforementioned FAS group as members. Thanks!
t0xic0der commented 2026-02-19 03:47:16 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Following the naming convention we have for SIGs, we do not include the sig term (Get it?) in the namespace and in the groups. Hence, the updated namespace would be called simply neuro and the groups would be called forge-neuro-owners and forge-neuro-members respectively. I have also gone ahead with updating the pull request to reflect the same.

Following the naming convention we have for SIGs, we do not include the `sig` term (Get it?) in the namespace and in the groups. Hence, the updated namespace would be called simply `neuro` and the groups would be called `forge-neuro-owners` and `forge-neuro-members` respectively. I have also gone ahead with updating the pull request to reflect the same.
ryanlerch commented 2026-02-19 05:49:51 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Created:

Created: * [forge-neuro-owners](https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/group/forge-neuro-owners/) with sponsors and owners, bot matching the sponsors list defined in [neuro-sig](https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/group/neuro-sig/) * [forge-neuro-members](https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/group/forge-neuro-members/) with no sponsor, and membership inherited through the [kde-sig](https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/group/neuro-sig/) group
t0xic0der commented 2026-02-19 05:52:08 +00:00
Member
Copy link

forge-neuro-members with no sponsor, and membership inherited through the kde-sig group

@ryanlerch, hope you mean the neuro-sig group ;P

@ankursinha, try logging out and logging back in for the mapping to take effect. Please go ahead with migrating your repositories from Pagure and feel free to let us know if there is anything else that we could help you with. Closing this as fixed.

> forge-neuro-members with no sponsor, and membership inherited through the kde-sig group @ryanlerch, hope you mean the [neuro-sig](https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/group/neuro-sig/) group ;P @ankursinha, try logging out and logging back in for the mapping to take effect. Please go ahead with migrating your repositories from Pagure and feel free to let us know if there is anything else that we could help you with. Closing this as fixed.
ankursinha commented 2026-02-19 10:07:35 +00:00
Author
Copy link

Hi @t0xic0der : thanks for that. I've logged out an into forge, but not seeing myself in the neuro-sig namespace yet:

https://forge.fedoraproject.org/neuro-sig|

(you're the only one there at the mo :P)

Hi @t0xic0der : thanks for that. I've logged out an into forge, but not seeing myself in the neuro-sig namespace yet: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/neuro-sig| (you're the only one there at the mo :P)
t0xic0der commented 2026-02-19 10:56:40 +00:00
Member
Copy link

I think I know why. I renamed the neuro-sig namespace to just neuro, now against which the mapping has been done as mentioned above. Maybe try logging and logging back in now and see if it works, but if it does not then maybe, @ryanlerch will have to re-run that mapping playbook again. We will wait for your approval before going ahead with changing the ticket's state.

I think I know why. I renamed the `neuro-sig` namespace to just `neuro`, now against which the mapping has been done as mentioned above. Maybe try logging and logging back in now and see if it works, but if it does not then maybe, @ryanlerch will have to re-run that mapping playbook again. We will wait for your approval before going ahead with changing the ticket's state.
ankursinha commented 2026-02-19 11:02:34 +00:00
Author
Copy link

Logged out and back in, but still no luck. Only in the "join" org.

Logged out and back in, but still no luck. Only in the "join" org.
ankursinha commented 2026-02-20 12:26:54 +00:00
Author
Copy link

Works now, closing. Thanks all :)

Works now, closing. Thanks all :)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
main
test
docs
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels   
Backlog Status
Needs Review
Work items that have been created or updated but need review, refinement, or approval before they can be considered ready for sprint planning.

  
Backlog Status
Ready
Work items that have been reviewed, refined, and are ready to be committed to a sprint. These items have clear requirements and could be worked on immediately when capacity is available.

  
Chore

Tasks that are necessary but don't directly deliver new value to the end-user. These are internal tasks like updating a library, managing user accounts, or setting up a new service.

  
points
01
A task that is simple, small, and has very little uncertainty. It should be easy enough for any team member to pick up and complete quickly, without a lot of discussion or research.

  
points
02
This is a task that is slightly more complex or larger than a "1." It might involve two or three simple steps, but the outcome is still very clear and there's little uncertainty.

  
points
03
medium-sized task with some noticeable complexity. It might require a bit more thought or collaboration. The steps are well-defined, but it's not a trivial change.

  
points
05
a significant piece of work. It has more complexity and a higher degree of uncertainty than smaller tasks. It might require some research, a design discussion, or collaboration across multiple teams.

  
points
08
complex task with a lot of uncertainty. It's often the largest size that a team will consider for a single sprint. It likely requires a detailed breakdown and multiple team members to complete.

  
points
13
Any task that feels like it's a "13" or more is considered an Epic. These are too large and uncertain to be worked on in a single sprint.

  
Priority
High
This is for work that is critical and needs to be addressed in the next sprint. It's often for urgent bugs, important features, or a major piece of technical debt that is blocking other work.

  
Priority
Low
This is for work that is good to do but not urgent. It's a candidate for being worked on when there's extra time or when it rises in importance. It can stay in the backlog for a longer period.

  
Priority
Medium
This is for important work that should be done soon, but isn't as urgent as a high-priority item. It will likely be considered for the next 1-2 sprints.

  
Sprint Status
Blocked
Indicates the work cannot proceed. There is a dependency or an issue that is preventing the team from completing the task. This is a flag for the Scrum Master to help unblock the team.

  
Sprint Status
Done
Work items that have been completed, reviewed, and integrated. No further work is needed within the current sprint.

  
Sprint Status
In Progress
This label is for work that a developer is actively working on. This is usually what you'll see on the "In Progress" column of your project board.

  
Sprint Status
Review
This indicates that the work is complete, but it is now in a review state. This could mean a peer code review, a QA check, or a review by the Product Owner.

  
Sprint Status
To Do
Work items that are committed to the sprint but haven't been started yet. These items are ready to be picked up by team members.

  
Technical Debt

work that improves the codebase without adding new features. It's work that pays down the "debt" you've accumulated, such as refactoring a messy piece of code, improving test coverage.

  
Work Item
Bug
Issues where the system is not working as intended or designed. Bugs represent deviations from expected behavior.

  
Work Item
Epic

  
Work Item
Spike

  
Work Item
Task

  
Work Item
User Story

  
Backlog Status
Needs Review
Work items that have been created or updated but need review, refinement, or approval before they can be considered ready for sprint planning.

  
Backlog Status
Ready
Work items that have been reviewed, refined, and are ready to be committed to a sprint. These items have clear requirements and can be worked on immediately when capacity is available.

  
chore

Work that needs to be done but doesn't add new functionality or fix bugs. Maintenance tasks that keep the system running smoothly and the codebase clean.

  
documentation

Work focused on creating, updating, or improving documentation for users, developers, or system administrators.

  
points
01
A task that is simple, small, and has very little uncertainty. It should be easy enough for any team member to pick up and complete quickly, without a lot of discussion or research.

  
points
02
This is a task that is slightly more complex or larger than a "1." It might involve two or three simple steps, but the outcome is still very clear and there's little uncertainty.

  
points
03
Medium-sized task with some noticeable complexity. It might require a bit more thought or collaboration. The steps are well-defined, but it's not a trivial change.

  
points
05
A significant piece of work. It has more complexity and a higher degree of uncertainty than smaller tasks. It might require some research, a design discussion, or collaboration across multiple teams.

  
points
08
Complex task with a lot of uncertainty. It's often the largest size that a team will consider for a single sprint. It likely requires a detailed breakdown and multiple team members to complete.

  
points
13
Any task that feels like it's a "13" or more is considered an Epic. These are too large and uncertain to be worked on in a single sprint and should be broken down.

  
Priority
High
This is for work that is critical and needs to be addressed in the next sprint. It's often for urgent bugs, important features, or a major piece of technical debt that is blocking other work.

  
Priority
Low
This is for work that is good to do but not urgent. It's a candidate for being worked on when there's extra time or when it rises in importance. It can stay in the backlog for a longer period.

  
Priority
Medium
This is for important work that should be done soon, but isn't as urgent as a high-priority item. It will likely be considered for the next 1-2 sprints.

  
Sprint Status
Blocked
Work items that cannot progress due to external dependencies, blockers, or issues that need resolution.

  
Sprint Status
Done
Work items that have been completed, reviewed, and integrated. No further work is needed within the current sprint.

  
Sprint Status
In Progress
Work items currently being worked on by a team member. Active development, research, or implementation is happening.

  
Sprint Status
Review
Work items that are complete but need review, testing, or approval before being marked as done.

  
Sprint Status
To Do
Work items that are committed to the sprint but haven't been started yet. These items are ready to be picked up by team members.

  
Technical Debt

Work that addresses shortcuts, workarounds, or suboptimal implementations that were done previously to meet deadlines. These items improve code quality, maintainability, or performance without adding new features.

  
Work Item
Bug
Issues where the system is not working as intended or designed. Bugs represent deviations from expected behavior.

  
Work Item
Epic
Large initiatives that are broken down into multiple smaller work items (user stories, tasks, bugs). Epics represent significant features or projects that span multiple sprints.

  
Work Item
Spike
Time-boxed research, investigation, or proof-of-concept work to reduce uncertainty or explore solutions. Spikes help inform future development decisions.

  
Work Item
Task
Used to break down larger user stories into smaller, manageable implementation pieces. They focus on the specific technical steps needed to deliver the user story's value.

  
Work Item
User Story
User-facing features or functionality that can be framed from a user perspective, describing what someone wants to accomplish and why.

No labels
Backlog Status
Needs Review
Backlog Status
Ready
Chore
points
01
points
02
points
03
points
05
points
08
points
13
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Sprint Status
Blocked
Sprint Status
Done
Sprint Status
In Progress
Sprint Status
Review
Sprint Status
To Do
Technical Debt
Work Item
Bug
Work Item
Epic
Work Item
Spike
Work Item
Task
Work Item
User Story
Backlog Status
Needs Review
Backlog Status
Ready
chore
documentation
points
01
points
02
points
03
points
05
points
08
points
13
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Sprint Status
Blocked
Sprint Status
Done
Sprint Status
In Progress
Sprint Status
Review
Sprint Status
To Do
Technical Debt
Work Item
Bug
Work Item
Epic
Work Item
Spike
Work Item
Task
Work Item
User Story
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Sprint 14
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
ryanlerch
t0xic0der
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
forge/forge#379
No description provided.