Find a better way to monitor FMN notifications UI #13082
Labels
No labels
announcement
anubis
authentication
aws
backlog
blocked
bodhi
ci
cloud
communishift
copr
database
day-to-day
dc-move
deprecated
dev
discourse
dns
downloads
easyfix
epel
firmitas
forgejo_migration
Gain
High
Gain
Low
Gain
Medium
gitlab
greenwave
hardware
help wanted
high-trouble
koji
koschei
lists
low-trouble
medium-trouble
mirrorlists
monitoring
Needs investigation
odcs
OpenShift
ops
outage
packager_workflow_blocker
pagure
permissions
Priority
Needs Review
Priority
Next Meeting
Priority
🔥 URGENT 🔥
Priority
Waiting on Assignee
Priority
Waiting on External
Priority
Waiting on Reporter
rabbitmq
release-monitoring
releng
request-for-resources
s390x
security
SMTP
sprint-0
sprint-1
src.fp.o
staging
unfreeze
waiverdb
websites-general
wiki
Backlog Status
Needs Review
Backlog Status
Ready
chore
documentation
points
01
points
02
points
03
points
05
points
08
points
13
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Sprint Status
Blocked
Sprint Status
Done
Sprint Status
In Progress
Sprint Status
Review
Sprint Status
To Do
Technical Debt
Work Item
Bug
Work Item
Epic
Work Item
Spike
Work Item
Task
Work Item
User Story
No milestone
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
infra/tickets#13082
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Description of request
Right now we use a datanommer check to monitor the FMN UI, but sometimes that emits an alert just because no one has edited a rule for a while.
That seems improvable, so this is a spike to see if we can look at Openshift endpoints or HTTP monitoring to actually check the health of the service, rather than relying on change messages to the bus.
Yes! FMN uses the two standard liveness and readiness checks, but it also publishes custom metrics that Collectd used to read and plot: the cache rebuild times. It's currently stored in memcached and only the CLI can get this data, but we could totally add a HTTP endpoint that would return these values as JSON, if that's easier for Zabbix. FMN's collectd connector also generates graphs with the total number of users, we could add this value too so that Zabbix can plot it.
After discussion with @abompard I opened https://github.com/fedora-infra/fmn/issues/1544 upstream to add an API we can hit for this.
Shall we close this then? or keep it to track the zabbix side?
@abompard how difficult is that API to add? Should we close this for now?