930c105 Breaks Fedora 35 #5

Closed
opened 2021-12-21 17:11:27 +00:00 by mrdavis7 · 7 comments

I am trying to build a custom Fedora 35 iot ostree and it breaks on missing greenboot-default-health-checks. This package does not appear to be in Fedora 35's everything repository. The issue was introduced in commit 930c105.

I am trying to build a custom Fedora 35 iot ostree and it breaks on missing greenboot-default-health-checks. This package does not appear to be in Fedora 35's everything repository. The issue was introduced in commit 930c105.
Owner

It's there, there was some renaming, make sure you've got updates enabled.

It's there, there was some renaming, make sure you've got updates enabled.
Owner

Metadata Update from @pbrobinson:

  • Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
**Metadata Update from @pbrobinson**: - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Author

I see that it is in there. It feels odd that if it is required to have the update repository to build the default fedora-iot.json, yet it is not present in the repository at all. Not really new user friendly.

I see that it is in there. It feels odd that if it is required to have the update repository to build the default fedora-iot.json, yet it is not present in the repository at all. Not really new user friendly.
Owner

I see that it is in there. It feels odd that if it is required to have the update repository to build the default fedora-iot.json, yet it is not present in the repository at all. Not really new user friendly.

It is in the repository, it's in the updates repository. We use the commit you refer to build the official Fedora IoT release so I know it works.

> I see that it is in there. It feels odd that if it is required to have the update repository to build the default fedora-iot.json, yet it is not present in the repository at all. Not really new user friendly. It is in the repository, it's in the updates repository. We use the commit you refer to build the official Fedora IoT release so I know it works.
Author

Sorry used two conflicting 'repository' statements and wasn't clear at all. What I meant to say is that: It is confusing that the fedora update yum repository is now a requirement for building fedora 35 iot, but things like the .repo file are not included in this git repo.

Sorry used two conflicting 'repository' statements and wasn't clear at all. What I meant to say is that: It is confusing that the fedora update yum repository is now a requirement for building fedora 35 iot, but things like the .repo file are not included in this git repo.
Author

Anyways just my opinion problem is solved thanks for the help and quick reply.

Anyways just my opinion problem is solved thanks for the help and quick reply.
Owner

For Fedora composes we use a different location (pungi-iot) for the repos hence why they're not included here. I'd be open for suggestions as to how to include them here to ease of use for people that compose their own.

For Fedora composes we use a different location (pungi-iot) for the repos hence why they're not included here. I'd be open for suggestions as to how to include them here to ease of use for people that compose their own.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
iot/ostree#5
No description provided.