Temporary membership for @peeweep #157
Labels
No labels
C: Introduction requested
C: Needs response
C: Progress check 1
C: Progress check 2
C: Progress check 3 - Final
C: Temporary membership approved
C: Temporary membership needed
I: Atomic
I: CI-CD
I: Cloud
I: CommOps
I: Data Science
I: Design
I: DevOps
I: Documentation
I: EDI
I: Fonts
I: Games
I: Go
I: Infrastructure
I: IoT
I: Marketing
I: Mentoring
I: Mobility
I: Music
I: Outreach
I: Package maintenance
I: Python
I: Quality assurance
I: Robotics
I: Rust
I: Science
I: Security
I: Server
I: Software development
I: Translation
I: Web development
S: Feedback
S: Getting to know Fedora
S: GSoC
S: Hello Fedora World
S: I am Fedora
S: Introduced myself
S: Invalid
S: Outreachy
S: Subscribed
S: User closed
S: User unresponsive
No milestone
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
join/WelcomeToFedora#157
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
I am currently doing some tmt releated work and planning to deploy my own testing-farm.io instance. Before setting it up , I would love to access the official public ranch https://testing-farm.io/ to see how it operates in practice. However, the login requires CLA+1 permissions.
I sent an email to tft@redhat.com requesting add me to testing-farm group but haven't received a response yet.
Could someone please add me into the temporary Fedora-Join group so I can get the required access to the testing farm?
Hello,
I don't think RH has the ability to add people to FAS groups.
However this seems like something the the temp membership could be granted for. I'll wait for atleast one more team member to respond here.
+1 from me to grant the temporary membership
The QA team maintain the testing farm, right? Are you in touch with them yet? We can give you temporary membership, sure, but it's probably better to be in touch with the QA team as the first port of call?
What do you think?
Hi @peeweep : how is it going? Were you able to get access via the QA team?
I'll close this for now, but please feel free to re-open it as required.