Update guidelines/modules/ROOT/pages/what-can-be-packaged.adoc #1332

Open
jlovejoy wants to merge 1 commit from jl-packaging-firmware into main
Contributor

This is an update to fix old links related to Fedora legal and licensing info. And move the technical requirements for firmware in Fedora which have been living in the licensing documentation, but are more appropriate here.

(I also added some line breaks to make it easier to read when using Pagure web UI, but if that is wrong to do, I can remove)

Signed-off-by: Jilayne Lovejoy

This is an update to fix old links related to Fedora legal and licensing info. And move the technical requirements for firmware in Fedora which have been living in the licensing documentation, but are more appropriate here. (I also added some line breaks to make it easier to read when using Pagure web UI, but if that is wrong to do, I can remove) Signed-off-by: Jilayne Lovejoy
Author
Contributor

@ref and @mattdm for awareness. this is moving the "firmware technical" requirements off this page https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-approval/#_licenses_allowed_for_firmware as that was never quite appropriate and this location seems more like it is the right place.

@ref and @mattdm for awareness. this is moving the "firmware technical" requirements off this page https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-approval/#_licenses_allowed_for_firmware as that was never quite appropriate and this location seems more like it is the right place.
Owner

Metadata Update from @tibbs:

  • Request assigned
**Metadata Update from @tibbs**: - Request assigned
Owner

This seems to just have slipped through the cracks. Unfortunately there are various different changes which would have been easier to review as separate commits, but I see three things:

  • Some line breaking (lines 10-13 and 18-19 in the new document)
  • Link fixing (lines 5 and 26-28, plus line 37 along with another change)
  • Movement of the guidelines for binary firmware into this document (lines 37-41)

I think we should just merge this, and I'll do so in a few days if nobody objects or immediately if I can get a +1. (Or anyone else can just merge it.)

This seems to just have slipped through the cracks. Unfortunately there are various different changes which would have been easier to review as separate commits, but I see three things: * Some line breaking (lines 10-13 and 18-19 in the new document) * Link fixing (lines 5 and 26-28, plus line 37 along with another change) * Movement of the guidelines for binary firmware into this document (lines 37-41) I think we should just merge this, and I'll do so in a few days if nobody objects or immediately if I can get a +1. (Or anyone else can just merge it.)
This pull request is broken due to missing fork information.
View command line instructions

Checkout

From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.
git fetch -u origin jl-packaging-firmware:jl-packaging-firmware
git switch jl-packaging-firmware

Merge

Merge the changes and update on Forgejo.

Warning: The "Autodetect manual merge" setting is not enabled for this repository, you will have to mark this pull request as manually merged afterwards.

git switch main
git merge --no-ff jl-packaging-firmware
git switch jl-packaging-firmware
git rebase main
git switch main
git merge --ff-only jl-packaging-firmware
git switch jl-packaging-firmware
git rebase main
git switch main
git merge --no-ff jl-packaging-firmware
git switch main
git merge --squash jl-packaging-firmware
git switch main
git merge --ff-only jl-packaging-firmware
git switch main
git merge jl-packaging-firmware
git push origin main
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
packaging/guidelines!1332
No description provided.