[main] Joining_the_Package_Maintainers.adoc: promote co-maintainer route more? #199
Labels
No labels
help-wanted
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
packaging/maintainer-docs#199
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
We received some feedback here at flock that the new package route of getting sponsored has a much steeper learning curve, and it does not necessarily lend itself to mentorship---since people dont' really come in contact with a sponsor until they've submitted a package.
So, we were wondering if promoting the co-maintainer route more would be useful?
We also need more hands to maintain existing packages.
Thoughts?
Long-term goal: Make non-packager Pull Requests for packagers work more "naturally" (presumably in forgejo-based distgit)