Manually trigger refresh from the admin UI #248
Labels
No labels
Closed As
Duplicate
Closed As
Fixed
Closed As
Invalid
discussions
easyfix
enhancement
task
ai-review-please
Backlog Status
Needs Review
Backlog Status
Ready
chore
documentation
points
01
points
02
points
03
points
05
points
08
points
13
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Sprint Status
Blocked
Sprint Status
Done
Sprint Status
In Progress
Sprint Status
Review
Sprint Status
To Do
Technical Debt
Work Item
Bug
Work Item
Epic
Work Item
Spike
Work Item
Task
Work Item
User Story
No milestone
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
quality/blockerbugs#248
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
I'd like to have a button in the admin interface to manually trigger
blockerbugs sync. In some cases it can help to be able to refresh bugs when dealing with some issue, without actually having to connect to the server.Issue tagged with: next
Big +1. I keep meaning to work on message consumption to reduce/eliminate the need for this, but in the absence of that, this would be really nice. I don't actually know how to log in to the server and do it manually since it got moved to Ze Cloud, so now I have to run a local pet instance which I can refresh when I need up-to-date info :/
Yes, another use case I haven't thought about before, is when preparing for a blocker review meeting (and working on vote tickets), or when one needs refreshed data during it.
A note for implementation: This will require making sure that multiple concurrent sync executions are either prevented or don't have negative effects. We currently don't have this problem, because the sync are running 30 minutes apart. But with an option to a manual trigger, it might easily happen that multiple people log in to the admin interface and run it in parallel (or they run it in parallel with the regular scheduled job).
Metadata Update from @kparal:
Metadata Update from @lbrabec:
PR is in #259
Metadata Update from @kparal: