Mention ON_QA/VERIFIED bugs without an update in Requests #249

Open
opened 2022-05-02 20:27:50 +00:00 by kparal · 2 comments
Owner

Bodhi updates are often not linked to accepted bugs. In that case, it's easy to miss that a blocker/FE fix is ready to be included/pushed. We can't do much about it, but can at least notify readers when the state is suspicious. If bugs are in ON_QA or VERIFIED state, but they don't have any linked update, that's suspicious. Let's add another alert section into /requests (we already have one for bug dependencies) which will list such bugs and ask the person to inspect them manually.

@adamwill

Bodhi updates are often not linked to accepted bugs. In that case, it's easy to miss that a blocker/FE fix is ready to be included/pushed. We can't do much about it, but can at least notify readers when the state is suspicious. If bugs are in ON_QA or VERIFIED state, but they don't have any linked update, that's suspicious. Let's add another alert section into `/requests` (we already have one for bug dependencies) which will list such bugs and ask the person to inspect them manually. @adamwill
Author
Owner

Issue tagged with: next

Issue tagged with: next
Author
Owner

Metadata Update from @kparal:

  • Custom field story_points adjusted to 3
**Metadata Update from @kparal**: - Custom field story_points adjusted to 3
kparal added this to the Next BB tasks project 2026-01-16 15:28:57 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
quality/blockerbugs#249
No description provided.