quality/blockerbugs
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 34 Pull requests 2 Projects 1 Releases Packages Activity Actions

Invisible content in Updates column #82

New issue
Closed
opened 2019-04-03 07:39:18 +00:00 by kparal · 9 comments
kparal commented 2019-04-03 07:39:18 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

See the screenshot. There's nothing in Updates, but the overlay shows an update.

blockerbugs.png

(Furthermore, if there's something in Updates, it's no longer a colored rectangle, just a hyperlinked text. Is that intentional?)

CC @frantisekz

See the screenshot. There's nothing in Updates, but the overlay shows an update. [![blockerbugs.png](/fedora-qa/blockerbugs/issue/raw/files/08b2fe5a8bb6edd274c7992b451e088d350ddaadb9f175c614d3343a1bb6c0ee-blockerbugs.png)](/fedora-qa/blockerbugs/issue/raw/files/08b2fe5a8bb6edd274c7992b451e088d350ddaadb9f175c614d3343a1bb6c0ee-blockerbugs.png) (Furthermore, if there's something in Updates, it's no longer a colored rectangle, just a hyperlinked text. Is that intentional?) CC @frantisekz
frantisekz commented 2019-04-03 14:20:09 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

So,
this is corner case issue because systemd was marked to fix the blocker, but it didn't and status was changed in bugzilla manually.

I am setting this to low priority as discussed with @kparal . Indeed, this is something definitely nice to have fixed but it might require deeper digging in blockerbugs app.

So, this is corner case issue because systemd was marked to fix the blocker, but it didn't and status was changed in bugzilla manually. I am setting this to low priority as discussed with @kparal . Indeed, this is something definitely nice to have fixed but it might require deeper digging in blockerbugs app.
frantisekz commented 2019-04-03 14:20:27 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Metadata Update from @frantisekz:

  • Issue priority set to: Low (was: Normal)
**Metadata Update from @frantisekz**: - Issue priority set to: Low (was: Normal)
kparal commented 2019-04-04 09:15:15 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

In our yesterday's conversation, I thought this was a different issue. As I currently understand it, it seems like all Bodhi updates pushed stable no longer display in the app. I think we should take a closer look at it in this case. It's definitely not top priority, but probably not a corner case either.

In our yesterday's conversation, I thought this was a different issue. As I currently understand it, it seems like all Bodhi updates pushed stable no longer display in the app. I think we should take a closer look at it in this case. It's definitely not top priority, but probably not a corner case either.
adamwill commented 2019-04-04 15:05:08 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

The problem is actually quite simple, I'll send a PR.

The problem is actually quite simple, I'll send a PR.
adamwill commented 2019-04-04 16:19:22 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

PR: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blockerbugs/pull-request/83

The labels are showing as unstyled text because the CSS file that defines the classes is not in the page header. I don't know why it isn't, though - everything looks like it should be. I'll dig into this more later today.

PR: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blockerbugs/pull-request/83 The labels are showing as unstyled text because the CSS file that defines the classes is not in the page header. I don't know *why* it isn't, though - everything looks like it should be. I'll dig into this more later today.
adamwill commented 2019-04-04 21:38:45 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

CSS fix PR: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blockerbugs/pull-request/84

that turned out to be straightforward, too...it just looked mysterious because I was working from an outdated 'develop' branch :)

CSS fix PR: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blockerbugs/pull-request/84 that turned out to be straightforward, too...it just looked mysterious because I was working from an outdated 'develop' branch :)
kparal commented 2019-04-05 10:19:59 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@frantisekz please review, and if everything looks good, please release and deploy the new version. Thanks!

@frantisekz please review, and if everything looks good, please release and deploy the new version. Thanks!
kparal commented 2019-04-05 10:20:14 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Metadata Update from @kparal:

  • Issue assigned to frantisekz
**Metadata Update from @kparal**: - Issue assigned to frantisekz
frantisekz commented 2019-04-05 10:47:44 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Commit 66a007f8 fixes this issue

Commit [66a007f8](https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blockerbugs/c/66a007f8) fixes this issue
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
develop
fix/296-blocker-review-voting-on-forge
staging
master
oidc_prep
discussion_link_bz
feature/sync_in_admin_ui
flask_middleware_oc
feature/bugdeps2
kparal/selfref
1.14
1.13
1.12
1.11
1.10
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6.1
1.6
1.5
1.4.1
1.4.0
1.3.1
1.3.0
1.2.1
1.2.0
1.1.0
1.0.0
0.7.4
0.7.3
0.7.2
0.7.1
0.7.0
0.6.1
0.6.0
0.5.0
0.4.15
0.4.14
0.4.13
0.4.12
0.4.4.11-1
0.4.4.11
0.4.4.10
0.4.4.7
0.4.4.6
0.4.4.5
0.4.4.3
0.4.4.2
0.4.4.1
0.4.4
0.4.3.6
0.4.3.5
0.4.3.4
0.4.3.3
0.4.3.1
0.4.3
0.4.2
0.4.1
0.4.0
0.3.0.3.4
t414-infrareviewfix
t414-proposalfix
0.3.0.3
0.3.0.2
0.3.0.1
0.3.0
0.2.5
Labels
Clear labels   
Closed As
Duplicate
Closed with the reason of Duplicate

  
Closed As
Fixed
Closed with the reason of Fixed

  
Closed As
Invalid
Closed with the reason of Invalid

  
discussions

issues related to the blocker discussion system in pagure

  
easyfix

   
enhancement

a request for or implementation of an enhancement (not a bug fix)

  
task

issue that isn't a bug fix or enhancement but some kind of admin task

  
Backlog Status
Needs Review
Work items that have been created or updated but need review, refinement, or approval before they can be considered ready for sprint planning.

  
Backlog Status
Ready
Work items that have been reviewed, refined, and are ready to be committed to a sprint. These items have clear requirements and can be worked on immediately when capacity is available.

  
chore

Work that needs to be done but doesn't add new functionality or fix bugs. Maintenance tasks that keep the system running smoothly and the codebase clean.

  
documentation

Work focused on creating, updating, or improving documentation for users, developers, or system administrators.

  
points
01
A task that is simple, small, and has very little uncertainty. It should be easy enough for any team member to pick up and complete quickly, without a lot of discussion or research.

  
points
02
This is a task that is slightly more complex or larger than a "1." It might involve two or three simple steps, but the outcome is still very clear and there's little uncertainty.

  
points
03
Medium-sized task with some noticeable complexity. It might require a bit more thought or collaboration. The steps are well-defined, but it's not a trivial change.

  
points
05
A significant piece of work. It has more complexity and a higher degree of uncertainty than smaller tasks. It might require some research, a design discussion, or collaboration across multiple teams.

  
points
08
Complex task with a lot of uncertainty. It's often the largest size that a team will consider for a single sprint. It likely requires a detailed breakdown and multiple team members to complete.

  
points
13
Any task that feels like it's a "13" or more is considered an Epic. These are too large and uncertain to be worked on in a single sprint and should be broken down.

  
Priority
Critical
This is for work that is urgent and of critical importance and so and must be addressed immediately with a higher priority than all other work, even if not originally planned for the current sprint.

  
Priority
High
This is for work that is critical and needs to be addressed in the next sprint. It's often for urgent bugs, important features, or a major piece of technical debt that is blocking other work.

  
Priority
Low
This is for work that is good to do but not urgent. It's a candidate for being worked on when there's extra time or when it rises in importance. It can stay in the backlog for a longer period.

  
Priority
Medium
This is for important work that should be done soon, but isn't as urgent as a high-priority item. It will likely be considered for the next 1-2 sprints.

  
Sprint Status
Blocked
Work items that cannot progress due to external dependencies, blockers, or issues that need resolution.

  
Sprint Status
Done
Work items that have been completed, reviewed, and integrated. No further work is needed within the current sprint.

  
Sprint Status
In Progress
Work items currently being worked on by a team member. Active development, research, or implementation is happening.

  
Sprint Status
Review
Work items that are complete but need review, testing, or approval before being marked as done.

  
Sprint Status
To Do
Work items that are committed to the sprint but haven't been started yet. These items are ready to be picked up by team members.

  
Technical Debt

Work that addresses shortcuts, workarounds, or suboptimal implementations that were done previously to meet deadlines. These items improve code quality, maintainability, or performance without adding new features.

  
Work Item
Bug
Issues where the system is not working as intended or designed. Bugs represent deviations from expected behavior.

  
Work Item
Epic
Large initiatives that are broken down into multiple smaller work items (user stories, tasks, bugs). Epics represent significant features or projects that span multiple sprints.

  
Work Item
Spike
Time-boxed research, investigation, or proof-of-concept work to reduce uncertainty or explore solutions. Spikes help inform future development decisions.

  
Work Item
Task
Used to break down larger user stories into smaller, manageable implementation pieces. They focus on the specific technical steps needed to deliver the user story's value.

  
Work Item
User Story
User-facing features or functionality that can be framed from a user perspective, describing what someone wants to accomplish and why.

No labels
Closed As
Duplicate
Closed As
Fixed
Closed As
Invalid
discussions
easyfix
enhancement
task
Backlog Status
Needs Review
Backlog Status
Ready
chore
documentation
points
01
points
02
points
03
points
05
points
08
points
13
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Sprint Status
Blocked
Sprint Status
Done
Sprint Status
In Progress
Sprint Status
Review
Sprint Status
To Do
Technical Debt
Work Item
Bug
Work Item
Epic
Work Item
Spike
Work Item
Task
Work Item
User Story
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
frantisekz
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
quality/blockerbugs#82
No description provided.