ELN coverage: run at least one BIOS test on composes, run advisory_boot on updates #538

Closed
opened 2026-04-29 06:59:36 +00:00 by adamwill · 2 comments
Owner

The latest round of ELN breakage exposed a couple of areas of missing coverage we should address:

  1. We should run at least one BIOS test on composes. Even if we don't care about BIOS on ELN at all, it would've caused us to notice that initramfs generation was broken sooner (by avoiding the bootloader bug that happens on UEFI)
  2. We should run advisory_boot on ELN updates. Again this would've caused us to notice the initramfs generation bug sooner.
The latest round of ELN breakage exposed a couple of areas of missing coverage we should address: 1. We should run at least one BIOS test on composes. Even if we don't care about BIOS on ELN at all, it would've caused us to notice that initramfs generation was broken sooner (by avoiding the bootloader bug that happens on UEFI) 2. We should run advisory_boot on ELN updates. Again this would've caused us to notice the initramfs generation bug sooner.
adamwill added this to the Sprint 9 project 2026-04-29 06:59:36 +00:00
adamwill modified the project from Sprint 9 to Sprint 10 2026-05-19 15:14:52 +00:00
Author
Owner

#556 does the second part of this, will add the first part tomorrow.

https://forge.fedoraproject.org/quality/os-autoinst-distri-fedora/pulls/556 does the second part of this, will add the first part tomorrow.
Author
Owner

#558 did the first part of this. Both merged and deployed, closing.

https://forge.fedoraproject.org/quality/os-autoinst-distri-fedora/pulls/558 did the first part of this. Both merged and deployed, closing.
adamwill 2026-05-21 00:43:33 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
quality/os-autoinst-distri-fedora#538
No description provided.