quality/tickets
11
4
Fork 0
Code Issues 61 Projects Activity Actions

Test Day for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AnacondaWebUIforFedoraWorkstation (particularly Cockpit custom storage) #764

New issue
Closed
opened 2024-02-13 22:11:56 +00:00 by adamwill · 15 comments
adamwill commented 2024-02-13 22:11:56 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

We should run a Test Day for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AnacondaWebUIforFedoraWorkstation , which is slated for Fedora 40 (delayed from Fedora 39). Current F40 Workstation live images have the new installer workflow. We should particularly focus on the new design (available since 20240210.n.1 compose) where the 'custom partitioning' workflow is provided by Cockpit's storage module. See https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3169 for more on that.

We should run a Test Day for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AnacondaWebUIforFedoraWorkstation , which is slated for Fedora 40 (delayed from Fedora 39). Current F40 Workstation live images have the new installer workflow. We should particularly focus on the new design (available since 20240210.n.1 compose) where the 'custom partitioning' workflow is provided by Cockpit's storage module. See https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3169 for more on that.
adamwill commented 2024-02-13 22:12:34 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@jkonecny for co-ordination with anaconda team

@jkonecny for co-ordination with anaconda team
sumantrom commented 2024-02-17 09:44:54 +00:00
Copy link

Metadata Update from @sumantrom:

  • Issue assigned to sumantrom
**Metadata Update from @sumantrom**: - Issue assigned to sumantrom
sumantrom commented 2024-02-19 15:55:23 +00:00
Copy link

@jkonecny , can we please get a date for this? I suggest the 27th Feb through 05th of March if nobody has any suggestions.

@jkonecny , can we please get a date for this? I suggest the 27th Feb through 05th of March if nobody has any suggestions.
sumantrom commented 2024-02-19 16:07:44 +00:00
Copy link

the wiki is here : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2024-02-XX_Anaconda_WebUI_for_Fedora_Workstation_by_default

I need to fix the date once that is fixed.. for test cases, I guess I will bring this up with QA OGs @adamwill and @kparal in the meeting now

the wiki is here : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2024-02-XX_Anaconda_WebUI_for_Fedora_Workstation_by_default I need to fix the date once that is fixed.. for test cases, I guess I will bring this up with QA OGs @adamwill and @kparal in the meeting now
adamwill commented 2024-02-19 22:52:54 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Update: FESCo today decided to defer the Change to F41. So this is less vital than before. It may still be of use to anaconda team to have the event run, though, and we can do it with images built before the reversion happens. @jkonecny do you think we should go ahead with the event?

Update: FESCo today [decided to defer the Change to F41](https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4CYBUJ7BFBV7ZV5AICKTHIZGKWO3X4FI/). So this is less vital than before. It may still be of use to anaconda team to have the event run, though, and we can do it with images built before the reversion happens. @jkonecny do you think we should go ahead with the event?
sumantrom commented 2024-02-20 11:29:46 +00:00
Copy link

The magazine team and other teams are on hold ... if we still want this in 22nd, we gotta hurry up if not we can move it to 27th or later

The magazine team and other teams are on hold ... if we still want this in 22nd, we gotta hurry up if not we can move it to 27th or later
adamwill commented 2024-02-20 16:25:55 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

It definitely doesn't need to be done in a hurry any more. A later date would be fine (probably better, so we can sort through the implications of the decision a bit).

It definitely doesn't need to be done in a hurry any more. A later date would be fine (probably better, so we can sort through the implications of the decision a bit).
adamwill commented 2024-02-21 22:14:16 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Metadata Update from @adamwill:

  • Issue priority set to: normal (was: critical)
**Metadata Update from @adamwill**: - Issue priority set to: normal (was: critical)
jkonecny commented 2024-02-27 11:23:52 +00:00
Copy link

Hi, sorry I'm catching up with everything.

It would be great to have this to find out feedback about the new solution. @adamwill when do you think will be reasonable date to do this?

Hi, sorry I'm catching up with everything. It would be great to have this to find out feedback about the new solution. @adamwill when do you think will be reasonable date to do this?
adamwill commented 2024-02-27 17:21:17 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

sumantro is mostly in charge of the schedule these days, I was just letting him know there was no urgent need to rush this any more :) I would say we should try and find a spot that's nicely separate from f40 test days to let this one be a 'star', and also try not to conflict with any likely validation rushes for f40 beta/final.

sumantro is mostly in charge of the schedule these days, I was just letting him know there was no urgent need to rush this any more :) I would say we should try and find a spot that's nicely separate from f40 test days to let this one be a 'star', and also try not to conflict with any likely validation rushes for f40 beta/final.
sumantrom commented 2024-05-18 02:00:50 +00:00
Copy link

@jkonecny , The slots are open, we can do this NOW (ie post june 5th) as part of Rawhide Test Days or we can do it do it post branch? if the changes are ready, we should do both :)

@jkonecny , The slots are open, we can do this NOW (ie post june 5th) as part of Rawhide Test Days or we can do it do it post branch? if the changes are ready, we *should* do both :)
sumantrom commented 2024-05-28 14:39:43 +00:00
Copy link

@jkonecny @adamwill , I know this has been pushed to out, but we can still do testing on whatever you guys have in Rawhide. You could also do a iso for the test day and then update the bits via a Copr. Please lemme know, how I can help!

@jkonecny @adamwill , I know this has been pushed to out, but we can still do testing on whatever you guys have in Rawhide. You could also do a iso for the test day and then update the bits via a Copr. Please lemme know, how I can help!
sumantrom commented 2024-11-06 03:26:43 +00:00
Copy link

Metadata Update from @sumantrom:

  • Issue marked as blocking: #794
**Metadata Update from @sumantrom**: - Issue marked as blocking: #794
kparal commented 2025-09-02 07:32:05 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

This happened in #794

This happened in #794
kparal commented 2025-09-02 07:32:05 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Metadata Update from @kparal:

  • Issue close_status updated to: Fixed
  • Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
**Metadata Update from @kparal**: - Issue close_status updated to: Fixed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
master
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels   
agile
related to Scrum or other Agile methodology

  
anacondawebui
tickets relating to the anaconda 'web ui' interface refresh

  
arm

   
blockerfe
Issues relating to the blocker / freeze exception process

  
Closed As
Duplicate
 Closed with the reason of Duplicate

  
Closed As
Fixed
 Closed with the reason of Fixed

  
Closed As
Invalid
 Closed with the reason of Invalid

  
Closed As
Wontfix
 Closed with the reason of Wontfix

  
Closed As
Worksforme
 Closed with the reason of Worksforme

  
coreos
issue related to coreos

  
criteria
release criteria-related issues

  
defect

   
easyfix

   
enhancement

   
iot
Issues related to IoT

  
meeting
a topic for the next QA meeting

  
meta
issues in the issue tracker itself (like, whooooaaa, man)

  
onboarding call
issues that are used to track new contributor onboarding

  
proventesters

   
retrospective
issues filed as a result of QA Retrospective feedback

  
silverblue
Issues related to silverblue

  
sponsor
requests to become a FAS group sponsor

  
test cases

   
test days

   
wiki
  
ai-review-please
Request AI review for a pull request

  
Backlog Status
Needs Review
 Work items that have been created or updated but need review, refinement, or approval before they can be considered ready for sprint planning.

  
Backlog Status
Ready
 Work items that have been reviewed, refined, and are ready to be committed to a sprint. These items have clear requirements and can be worked on immediately when capacity is available.

  
chore
Work that needs to be done but doesn't add new functionality or fix bugs. Maintenance tasks that keep the system running smoothly and the codebase clean.

  
documentation
Work focused on creating, updating, or improving documentation for users, developers, or system administrators.

  
points
01
 A task that is simple, small, and has very little uncertainty. It should be easy enough for any team member to pick up and complete quickly, without a lot of discussion or research.

  
points
02
 This is a task that is slightly more complex or larger than a "1." It might involve two or three simple steps, but the outcome is still very clear and there's little uncertainty.

  
points
03
 Medium-sized task with some noticeable complexity. It might require a bit more thought or collaboration. The steps are well-defined, but it's not a trivial change.

  
points
05
 A significant piece of work. It has more complexity and a higher degree of uncertainty than smaller tasks. It might require some research, a design discussion, or collaboration across multiple teams.

  
points
08
 Complex task with a lot of uncertainty. It's often the largest size that a team will consider for a single sprint. It likely requires a detailed breakdown and multiple team members to complete.

  
points
13
 Any task that feels like it's a "13" or more is considered an Epic. These are too large and uncertain to be worked on in a single sprint and should be broken down.

  
pr2jira
Sync this pull request to Jira for Agility tracking. Only use for PRs without a corresponding ticket.

  
Priority
Critical
 This is for work that is urgent and of critical importance and so and must be addressed immediately with a higher priority than all other work, even if not originally planned for the current sprint.

  
Priority
High
 This is for work that is critical and needs to be addressed in the next sprint. It's often for urgent bugs, important features, or a major piece of technical debt that is blocking other work.

  
Priority
Low
 This is for work that is good to do but not urgent. It's a candidate for being worked on when there's extra time or when it rises in importance. It can stay in the backlog for a longer period.

  
Priority
Medium
 This is for important work that should be done soon, but isn't as urgent as a high-priority item. It will likely be considered for the next 1-2 sprints.

  
Sprint Status
Blocked
 Work items that cannot progress due to external dependencies, blockers, or issues that need resolution.

  
Sprint Status
Done
 Work items that have been completed, reviewed, and integrated. No further work is needed within the current sprint.

  
Sprint Status
In Progress
 Work items currently being worked on by a team member. Active development, research, or implementation is happening.

  
Sprint Status
Review
 Work items that are complete but need review, testing, or approval before being marked as done.

  
Sprint Status
To Do
 Work items that are committed to the sprint but haven't been started yet. These items are ready to be picked up by team members.

  
Technical Debt
Work that addresses shortcuts, workarounds, or suboptimal implementations that were done previously to meet deadlines. These items improve code quality, maintainability, or performance without adding new features.

  
Work Item
Bug
 Issues where the system is not working as intended or designed. Bugs represent deviations from expected behavior.

  
Work Item
Epic
 Large initiatives that are broken down into multiple smaller work items (user stories, tasks, bugs). Epics represent significant features or projects that span multiple sprints.

  
Work Item
Spike
 Time-boxed research, investigation, or proof-of-concept work to reduce uncertainty or explore solutions. Spikes help inform future development decisions.

  
Work Item
Task
 Used to break down larger user stories into smaller, manageable implementation pieces. They focus on the specific technical steps needed to deliver the user story's value.

  
Work Item
User Story
 User-facing features or functionality that can be framed from a user perspective, describing what someone wants to accomplish and why.

No labels
agile
anacondawebui
arm
blockerfe
Closed As
Duplicate
Closed As
Fixed
Closed As
Invalid
Closed As
Wontfix
Closed As
Worksforme
coreos
criteria
defect
easyfix
enhancement
iot
meeting
meta
onboarding call
proventesters
retrospective
silverblue
sponsor
test cases
test days
wiki
ai-review-please
Backlog Status
Needs Review
Backlog Status
Ready
chore
documentation
points
01
points
02
points
03
points
05
points
08
points
13
pr2jira
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Sprint Status
Blocked
Sprint Status
Done
Sprint Status
In Progress
Sprint Status
Review
Sprint Status
To Do
Technical Debt
Work Item
Bug
Work Item
Epic
Work Item
Spike
Work Item
Task
Work Item
User Story
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Fedora 40
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
sumantrom
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Blocks
#794 Anaconda Web UI - Test Days
quality/tickets
Reference
quality/tickets#764
No description provided.