log4j contains files with unacceptable licenses #11083

Open
opened 2022-10-13 10:40:20 +00:00 by mkoncek · 4 comments

See https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/78.
I opened PRs fixing this issue:

But the files already present in lookaside cache still contain the zip entry.
Looks like the first version which started using glyphicons.zip is:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/log4j/apache-log4j-2.13.0-src.tar.gz/sha512/

The zip archive is not required for the package functioning.

See https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/78. I opened PRs fixing this issue: * https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/log4j/pull-request/16 * https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/log4j/pull-request/17 But the files already present in lookaside cache still contain the zip entry. Looks like the first version which started using glyphicons.zip is: https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/log4j/apache-log4j-2.13.0-src.tar.gz/sha512/ The zip archive is not required for the package functioning.

Metadata Update from @phsmoura:

  • Issue tagged with: medium-gain, medium-trouble, ops
**Metadata Update from @phsmoura**: - Issue tagged with: medium-gain, medium-trouble, ops

Thank you for that @mkoncek. is the request here is to ensure that glyphicons.zip is removed from the lookaside cache source tarballs for log4j from when the project started including them up until it stopped? Will that cause any issues with the previous built packages, etc?

Thank you for that @mkoncek. is the request here is to ensure that `glyphicons.zip` is removed from the lookaside cache source tarballs for log4j from when the project started including them up until it stopped? Will that cause any issues with the previous built packages, etc?
Author

Hi, you are correct, it should be done for all the package version from 2.13.0 up until 2.17.2, release 5.
As I said, the zip file is not needed for the package to work.

Hi, you are correct, it should be done for all the package version from 2.13.0 up until 2.17.2, release 5. As I said, the zip file is not needed for the package to work.

Thank you @mkoncek. @jnsamyak, @patrikp, @amedvede, let's get this on one of the upcoming releng meetings to double check the gain/effort and for someone to pick up and move it forward.

Thank you @mkoncek. @jnsamyak, @patrikp, @amedvede, let's get this on one of the upcoming releng meetings to double check the gain/effort and for someone to pick up and move it forward.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
releng/tickets#11083
No description provided.