The aarch64 minimal synced to the wrong location for releases #12032
Labels
No labels
after freeze
automation
backlog
blocked
change-ack
change-nak
change-noreleng
changes
Closed As
Can't Fix
Closed As
Duplicate
Closed As
Fixed
Closed As
Fixed with Explanation
Closed As
Get back later
Closed As
Grooming
Closed As
Insufficient data
Closed As
Invalid
Closed As
It's all good
Closed As
taiga
Closed As
upstream
day-to-day
dev
docs
easyfix
epel
f26
f27
f28
f29
f30
f31
f32
f33
f34
f35
f36
f37
f38
f39
f40
f41
f42
f43
f44
f45
fedora
groomed
high-gain
high-trouble
in-progress
in-review
investigation
legal
low-gain
low-trouble
mass rebuild
medium-gain
medium-trouble
meeting
mini-initiative
new_artifact
ops
pdc_retirement
rawhide
RCA
review
script
sidetarget
sprint-0
sprint-1
sprint-2
sprint-3
sprint-4
sprint-5
unfrozen
waiting on external
Backlog Status
Needs Review
Backlog Status
Ready
chore
documentation
points
01
points
02
points
03
points
05
points
08
points
13
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
release-process
Sprint Status
Blocked
Sprint Status
Done
Sprint Status
In Progress
Sprint Status
Review
Sprint Status
To Do
Technical Debt
Work Item
Bug
Work Item
Epic
Work Item
Spike
Work Item
Task
Work Item
User Story
No milestone
No project
No assignees
5 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
releng/tickets#12032
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
The minimal image is a primary artifact so should be synced to primary, this is the case on nightlies. For releases it's synced to fedora-secondary. It should be synced to primary, I think the sync-release script wasn't updated when that changed. It would be worth ensuring all the sync release artifacts go to the same locations as the nightlies.
When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD)
For F-40 Beta.
When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD)
N/A
If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact?
People have complained they can't always find arm artifacts, I meant to file this ages ago but forgot :(
Metadata Update from @phsmoura:
ok, so that should be:
mkdir /pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/40_Beta/Spins/aarch64
mv /pub/fedora-secondary/releases/test/40_Beta/Spins/aarch64/Fedora-Minimal-40_Beta-1.10.aarch64.raw.xz /pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/40_Beta/Spins/aarch64/Fedora-Minimal-40_Beta-1.10.aarch64.raw.xz
mv /pub/fedora-secondary/releases/test/40_Beta/Spins/aarch64/Fedora-Spins-images-40_Beta-1.10-aarch64-CHECKSUM /pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/40_Beta/Spins/aarch64/Fedora-Spins-images-40_Beta-1.10-aarch64-CHECKSUM
Right?
and @jnsamyak we need to adjust the SOP to put this one in the main repo instead of secondary.
We discussed this in our releng weekly call today, where we see one more option for fixing this which is to move the entire directory to the main repo; so it will mitigate the complexity of choosing the images every time, but this open for discussion/suggestions?
cc: @pbrobinson @kevin
Looping in @adamwill and @darknao , because these changes are gonna probably affect both for fedfind and websites respectively.
Yeah, I think moving the entire directoy is the way to go. ;)
Any thoughts from anyone on that?
We will need to adjust the script that syncs the release.
I don't know if there need to be websites or fedfind changes.
I am fine with moving it all.
I'm fine with it too. That requires a small change on the website but I'll take care of it on release day.
Metadata Update from @jnsamyak:
Metadata Update from @jnsamyak: