The aarch64 minimal synced to the wrong location for releases #12032

Open
opened 2024-03-21 22:26:25 +00:00 by pbrobinson · 8 comments
Member
  • Describe the issue

The minimal image is a primary artifact so should be synced to primary, this is the case on nightlies. For releases it's synced to fedora-secondary. It should be synced to primary, I think the sync-release script wasn't updated when that changed. It would be worth ensuring all the sync release artifacts go to the same locations as the nightlies.

  • When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD)
    For F-40 Beta.

  • When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD)
    N/A

  • If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact?
    People have complained they can't always find arm artifacts, I meant to file this ages ago but forgot :(

* Describe the issue The minimal image is a primary artifact so should be synced to primary, this is the case on nightlies. For releases it's synced to fedora-secondary. It should be synced to primary, I think the sync-release script wasn't updated when that changed. It would be worth ensuring all the sync release artifacts go to the same locations as the nightlies. * When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) For F-40 Beta. * When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) N/A * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? People have complained they can't always find arm artifacts, I meant to file this ages ago but forgot :(

Metadata Update from @phsmoura:

  • Issue tagged with: medium-gain, medium-trouble, ops
**Metadata Update from @phsmoura**: - Issue tagged with: medium-gain, medium-trouble, ops
Owner

ok, so that should be:

mkdir /pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/40_Beta/Spins/aarch64
mv /pub/fedora-secondary/releases/test/40_Beta/Spins/aarch64/Fedora-Minimal-40_Beta-1.10.aarch64.raw.xz /pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/40_Beta/Spins/aarch64/Fedora-Minimal-40_Beta-1.10.aarch64.raw.xz
mv /pub/fedora-secondary/releases/test/40_Beta/Spins/aarch64/Fedora-Spins-images-40_Beta-1.10-aarch64-CHECKSUM /pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/40_Beta/Spins/aarch64/Fedora-Spins-images-40_Beta-1.10-aarch64-CHECKSUM

Right?

and @jnsamyak we need to adjust the SOP to put this one in the main repo instead of secondary.

ok, so that should be: mkdir /pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/40_Beta/Spins/aarch64 mv /pub/fedora-secondary/releases/test/40_Beta/Spins/aarch64/Fedora-Minimal-40_Beta-1.10.aarch64.raw.xz /pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/40_Beta/Spins/aarch64/Fedora-Minimal-40_Beta-1.10.aarch64.raw.xz mv /pub/fedora-secondary/releases/test/40_Beta/Spins/aarch64/Fedora-Spins-images-40_Beta-1.10-aarch64-CHECKSUM /pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/40_Beta/Spins/aarch64/Fedora-Spins-images-40_Beta-1.10-aarch64-CHECKSUM Right? and @jnsamyak we need to adjust the SOP to put this one in the main repo instead of secondary.
Owner

We discussed this in our releng weekly call today, where we see one more option for fixing this which is to move the entire directory to the main repo; so it will mitigate the complexity of choosing the images every time, but this open for discussion/suggestions?

cc: @pbrobinson @kevin

Looping in @adamwill and @darknao , because these changes are gonna probably affect both for fedfind and websites respectively.

We discussed this in our releng weekly call today, where we see one more option for fixing this which is to move the entire directory to the main repo; so it will mitigate the complexity of choosing the images every time, but this open for discussion/suggestions? cc: @pbrobinson @kevin Looping in @adamwill and @darknao , because these changes are gonna probably affect both for fedfind and websites respectively.
Owner

Yeah, I think moving the entire directoy is the way to go. ;)

Any thoughts from anyone on that?

We will need to adjust the script that syncs the release.
I don't know if there need to be websites or fedfind changes.

Yeah, I think moving the entire directoy is the way to go. ;) Any thoughts from anyone on that? We will need to adjust the script that syncs the release. I don't know if there need to be websites or fedfind changes.
Author
Member

I am fine with moving it all.

I am fine with moving it all.
Contributor

I'm fine with it too. That requires a small change on the website but I'll take care of it on release day.

I'm fine with it too. That requires a small change on the website but I'll take care of it on release day.
Owner

Metadata Update from @jnsamyak:

  • Issue assigned to jnsamyak
**Metadata Update from @jnsamyak**: - Issue assigned to jnsamyak
Owner

Metadata Update from @jnsamyak:

  • Assignee reset
**Metadata Update from @jnsamyak**: - Assignee reset
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
5 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
releng/tickets#12032
No description provided.