ppc64le generation used during build. #13253
Labels
No labels
after freeze
automation
backlog
blocked
change-ack
change-nak
change-noreleng
changes
Closed As
Can't Fix
Closed As
Duplicate
Closed As
Fixed
Closed As
Fixed with Explanation
Closed As
Get back later
Closed As
Grooming
Closed As
Insufficient data
Closed As
Invalid
Closed As
It's all good
Closed As
taiga
Closed As
upstream
day-to-day
dev
docs
easyfix
epel
f26
f27
f28
f29
f30
f31
f32
f33
f34
f35
f36
f37
f38
f39
f40
f41
f42
f43
f44
f45
fedora
groomed
high-gain
high-trouble
in-progress
in-review
investigation
legal
low-gain
low-trouble
mass rebuild
medium-gain
medium-trouble
meeting
mini-initiative
new_artifact
ops
pdc_retirement
rawhide
RCA
review
script
sidetarget
sprint-0
sprint-1
sprint-2
sprint-3
sprint-4
sprint-5
unfrozen
waiting on external
Backlog Status
Needs Review
Backlog Status
Ready
chore
documentation
points
01
points
02
points
03
points
05
points
08
points
13
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Sprint Status
Blocked
Sprint Status
Done
Sprint Status
In Progress
Sprint Status
Review
Sprint Status
To Do
Technical Debt
Work Item
Bug
Work Item
Epic
Work Item
Spike
Work Item
Task
Work Item
User Story
No milestone
No project
No assignees
5 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
releng/tickets#13253
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Hi,
I would like to ask what version of ppc64le is available in fedora space for builds.
I'm trying to test newer version of nodejs and they now sadly only support PowerPC 9, therefore when I try to build it in koji, my build fails because of PowerPC8 usage.
Is PowerPC 9 is available for builds and if it is could it be perhaps specified that nodejs packages are build using it?
Thank you.
Fedora's ppc64le are POWER10, so I don't think that's the problem. Rather, the default compiler baseline for ppc64le in Fedora is still POWER8, as defined here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gcc/blob/rawhide/f/gcc.spec#_1264
If you were to build nodejs26 (?) for POWER9, then it should be fine for building other things with it in koji, but POWER8 users would not be able to run it.
Therefore, this doesn't seem like a releng issue; I suggest you bring this to FESCo instead.
It could be a fesco issue, or just something to discuss with tools folks first.
I have some other things to mention to them, so I'll send an email and mention this too.
So, the baseline is power8, and I don't think the tools folks want to move that.
I'm not sure what to do for your newer nodejs packages.
If you change them to use power9, that will be a bit unexpected for power8 fedora users. :(
CC: @fweimer @sharkcz
@tjuhasz , do you have more details about the build failure?
Where is the POWER9 dependency coming from? Is it a SIMD library used by V8 (Highway maybe)?
@sharkcz, from this scratch build.
The failures are specifically:
{standard input}:177671: Error: operand out of range (0x9208 is not between 0xffffffffffff8000 and 0x7ffc)on a LIEF compilation step.
@fweimer Sorry, I don't know exactly the pain point, but we received message from upstream that the support for POWER8 is being dropped due to V8 removing some Power 8 codepaths.
@tjuhasz wrote in #13253 (comment):
this looks like a "normal" compiler issue, perhaps a GCC 16 regression, if it builds in F<=43
So not a regression, reproduced in F-43 with GCC 15 as well, but an issue of using
-mmininal-tocin the compiler flags. Dunno where it is coming from, but I believe it's not from Fedora.