F45 System-Wide Change: Disable Vendor Change by Default #13394
Labels
No labels
after freeze
automation
backlog
blocked
change-ack
change-nak
change-noreleng
changes
Closed As
Can't Fix
Closed As
Duplicate
Closed As
Fixed
Closed As
Fixed with Explanation
Closed As
Get back later
Closed As
Grooming
Closed As
Insufficient data
Closed As
Invalid
Closed As
It's all good
Closed As
taiga
Closed As
upstream
day-to-day
dev
docs
easyfix
epel
f26
f27
f28
f29
f30
f31
f32
f33
f34
f35
f36
f37
f38
f39
f40
f41
f42
f43
f44
f45
fedora
groomed
high-gain
high-trouble
in-progress
in-review
investigation
legal
low-gain
low-trouble
mass rebuild
medium-gain
medium-trouble
meeting
mini-initiative
new_artifact
ops
pdc_retirement
rawhide
RCA
review
script
sidetarget
sprint-0
sprint-1
sprint-2
sprint-3
sprint-4
sprint-5
unfrozen
waiting on external
Backlog Status
Needs Review
Backlog Status
Ready
chore
documentation
points
01
points
02
points
03
points
05
points
08
points
13
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Sprint Status
Blocked
Sprint Status
Done
Sprint Status
In Progress
Sprint Status
Review
Sprint Status
To Do
Technical Debt
Work Item
Bug
Work Item
Epic
Work Item
Spike
Work Item
Task
Work Item
User Story
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
releng/tickets#13394
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Please review the following Fedora 45 System Wide Change Proposal: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DisableVendorChangeByDefault
Summary of the change:
Starting with Fedora Linux 45, DNF5 will no longer automatically replace an installed package with a version from a different vendor during upgrades, downgrades, or dependency resolution. Users who want to intentionally switch a package to a different vendor will need to do so explicitly, for example using the
--from-vendor=option.Release Engineering involvement:
The implementation is limited to two configuration file changes in the fedora-release-common package. I assume this change does not require a mass rebuild or any changes to installer image generation or update package delivery.
Targeted release: Fedora Linux 45
Okay, I went through the proposal. Once the approval goes through for the change, do you want releng to handle the file configuration changes? Or, is it something you are looking for reviews?
@jnsamyak
This ticket is mainly a heads-up about the upcoming System-Wide Change for F45 and a request for your review of the proposal.
I will prepare and file the PR with the necessary configuration file changes myself. I assume this change shouldn't be an issue for releng. The theoretical risk during the transition could occur if there is a step in the release engineering pipeline or build chain where a package is installed and subsequently replaced (via upgrade/reinstall/downgrade) by a package from a different vendor. Without explicitly allowing the vendor change, this could now fail or block.
Awesome, if you need anything from me let me know, thanks!