Orphaned package yields retirement warning although there was a migration (oxygen-icon-theme) #13412
Labels
No labels
after freeze
automation
backlog
blocked
change-ack
change-nak
change-noreleng
changes
Closed As
Can't Fix
Closed As
Duplicate
Closed As
Fixed
Closed As
Fixed with Explanation
Closed As
Get back later
Closed As
Grooming
Closed As
Insufficient data
Closed As
Invalid
Closed As
It's all good
Closed As
taiga
Closed As
upstream
day-to-day
dev
docs
easyfix
epel
f26
f27
f28
f29
f30
f31
f32
f33
f34
f35
f36
f37
f38
f39
f40
f41
f42
f43
f44
f45
fedora
groomed
high-gain
high-trouble
in-progress
in-review
investigation
legal
low-gain
low-trouble
mass rebuild
medium-gain
medium-trouble
meeting
mini-initiative
new_artifact
ops
pdc_retirement
rawhide
RCA
review
script
sidetarget
sprint-0
sprint-1
sprint-2
sprint-3
sprint-4
sprint-5
unfrozen
waiting on external
Backlog Status
Needs Review
Backlog Status
Ready
chore
documentation
points
01
points
02
points
03
points
05
points
08
points
13
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
release-process
Sprint Status
Blocked
Sprint Status
Done
Sprint Status
In Progress
Sprint Status
Review
Sprint Status
To Do
Technical Debt
Work Item
Bug
Work Item
Epic
Work Item
Spike
Work Item
Task
Work Item
User Story
No milestone
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
releng/tickets#13412
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Describe the issue
On 2026-06-21 I received a 'Orphaned packages' report because the oxygen-icon-theme dependency of the quassel package was orphaned.
There are two issues with that report:
Firstly, for packages that depend on oxygen-icon-theme the listing seems to be wrong and misleading, because although the oxygen-icon-theme source package indeed was orphaned,
it was also migrated to the kf6-oxygen-icons source package which now does provide the oxygen-icon-theme package.
Thus, it looks like no change is needed in dependent packages such as quassel and thus the report shouldn't warn about this, as this creates confusion and wastes the time of affected maintainers.
Since the report warns:
I hope that the packages depending on oxygen-icon-theme aren't really auto-retired,
i.e. that the retirement process is more sophisticated and only retires the depending packages if their dependencies are truly broken.
Please clarify how this works.
Secondly, the report template needs to be adjusted for the new repository location, as it still reads:
When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD)
2026-07-23, i.e. I need the clarification whether the auto-retirement of dependent package would affect packages that depend on oxygen-icon-theme.
When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD)
n/a
If we cannot complete this, what is the impact? [Dependencies/Blocker]
possibly dependent packages are retired that shouldn't be retired
Checklist
@gotmax, looping you in, since I believe you have looked at this script before?
Hi @gsauthof, I'm sorry for any confusion. There is nothing that you need to do here, since
oxygen-icon-themeis still available but just provided by a different package. This false positive is a known problem with the dependency resolution in the orphaned packages report script1, but the bug will not cause quassel or any other packages that depend onoxygen-icon-themeto be retired.We should indeed change the "otherwise your package will be retired when the affected package gets retired" message in the report, as that is not actually how the process works. There are separate Fails To Build From Source and Fails to Install package policies that could kick in for any package with broken dependencies (whether caused by package retirements or other problems), but this is a separate process with separate tooling. The goal of the Orphaned Packages Process dependency report is just to provide a helpful report to notify maintainers so they can take advanced action if necessary. Only packages that are actually orphaned can get retired under the Orphaned Packages Report.
As for the issue with the old Pagure.io links, that should be fixed now.
This is the same root cause as #11460. There is a WIP PR from @jnsamyak in releng/tooling#13031 and an effort to rewrite the report script entirely in https://forge.fedoraproject.org/packaging/orphansv2. ↩︎