Untag binutils-2.47.50-4.fc46 #13500

Closed
opened 2026-08-25 19:16:46 +00:00 by jistone · 2 comments

Describe the issue

There appears to be a regression in binutils-2.47.50-4.fc46, whereas binutils-2.47.50-2.fc46 and binutils-2.47-1.fc45 were fine. I encountered this when building rust-1.98.0 and filed this bz:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2523163

I worked around that for myself in a sidetag with older binutils. Since it happened during a profiling phase of rust's build, I thought it might be pretty niche, but now we're seeing similar issues in koschei rebuilds, like:

https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/23858689
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/23858546

I've confirmed in local mock that rust-sled builds fine with downgraded binutils-2.47.50-2.fc46.

When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD)

ASAP

When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD)

Once binutils is fixed.

If we cannot complete this, what is the impact? [Dependencies/Blocker]

Rust builds may FTBFS on aarch64 on rawhide; unknown if other languages may be affected as well.


Checklist

  • I have checked existing issues for duplicates
  • I have filled out all the fields above
  • I have provided relevant links or references (if applicable)
## Describe the issue There appears to be a regression in `binutils-2.47.50-4.fc46`, whereas `binutils-2.47.50-2.fc46` and `binutils-2.47-1.fc45` were fine. I encountered this when building `rust-1.98.0` and filed this bz: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2523163 I worked around that for myself in a sidetag with older binutils. Since it happened during a profiling phase of rust's build, I thought it might be pretty niche, but now we're seeing similar issues in koschei rebuilds, like: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/23858689 https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/23858546 I've confirmed in local mock that `rust-sled` builds fine with downgraded `binutils-2.47.50-2.fc46`. ## When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) ASAP ## When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) Once binutils is fixed. ## If we cannot complete this, what is the impact? [Dependencies/Blocker] Rust builds may FTBFS on aarch64 on rawhide; unknown if other languages may be affected as well. --- ## Checklist - [x] I have checked existing issues for duplicates - [x] I have filled out all the fields above - [x] I have provided relevant links or references (if applicable)
kevin self-assigned this 2026-08-25 20:44:49 +00:00
kevin removed their assignment 2026-08-25 20:44:57 +00:00
Owner

Done.

Done.
kevin closed this issue 2026-08-25 20:45:02 +00:00
Member

I've also untagged binutils-2.47.50-4.eln159 from ELN and tagged binutils-2.47-1.eln158 in.

I've also untagged binutils-2.47.50-4.eln159 from ELN and tagged binutils-2.47-1.eln158 in.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
releng/tickets#13500
No description provided.