server/user-documentation
10
3
Fork 8
Code Issues Pull requests 2 Projects Activity

Add steps to dnsmasq setup guide to avoid conflicts with systemd-resolved #106

Merged
ryanlerch merged 2 commits from dnsmasq-admin-docs into main 2026-06-03 02:54:58 +00:00
Conversation 6 Commits 2 Files changed 1 +20 -3
tsobczynski commented 2023-04-26 20:38:07 +00:00
Contributor
Copy link

I added steps to disable the systemd-resolved stub resolver and trigger Network Manager to produce a suitable /etc/resolv.conf to make use of dnsmasq. Without these additional steps, I found that name resolution was broken at the end of dnsmasq setup on Fedora Server 37. Note that there is a related issue with a patch in Network Manager to fix a problem generating the search domain in resolv.conf: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/-/issues/1281

I added steps to disable the systemd-resolved stub resolver and trigger Network Manager to produce a suitable /etc/resolv.conf to make use of dnsmasq. Without these additional steps, I found that name resolution was broken at the end of dnsmasq setup on Fedora Server 37. Note that there is a related issue with a patch in Network Manager to fix a problem generating the search domain in resolv.conf: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/-/issues/1281
pboy commented 2024-01-10 11:29:18 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Thanks for the contribution and sorry for the long delay. Unfortunately, I couldn't manage to make it in time. I'll check your proposal with 39 now.

Thanks for the contribution and sorry for the long delay. Unfortunately, I couldn't manage to make it in time. I'll check your proposal with 39 now.
tsobczynski commented 2024-01-10 14:17:04 +00:00
Author
Contributor
Copy link

Understood. Thank you for the update! =E2=80=94Tom

On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 6:29=E2=80=AFAM Peter Boy pagure@pagure.io wrote:

pboy commented on the pull-request: Add steps to dnsmasq setup guide to avoid conflicts with systemd-resolved that you are following:
Thanks for the contribution and sorry for the long delay. Unfortunately, = I couldn't manage to make it in time. I'll check your proposal with 39 now.

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-server/pull-request/106

Understood. Thank you for the update! =E2=80=94Tom On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 6:29=E2=80=AFAM Peter Boy <pagure@pagure.io> wrote: > > pboy commented on the pull-request: `Add steps to dnsmasq setup guide to > avoid conflicts with systemd-resolved` that you are following: > `` > Thanks for the contribution and sorry for the long delay. Unfortunately, = I > couldn't manage to make it in time. I'll check your proposal with 39 now. > `` > > To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email > https://pagure.io/fedora-server/pull-request/106 >
copperi commented 2024-11-06 16:56:52 +00:00
Contributor
Copy link

rebased onto cdc548ca43

rebased onto cdc548ca43a85f402bd6537ce378ae209090b2d5
aggraxis commented 2025-08-16 14:42:05 +00:00
Member
Copy link

I realize this is so very late, but this documentation looks good to me. I have to do the same thing in order to get pihole to work properly on Fedora Server. (Which is doing dnsmasq as well.)

I realize this is so very late, but this documentation looks good to me. I have to do the same thing in order to get pihole to work properly on Fedora Server. (Which is doing dnsmasq as well.)
aggraxis commented 2025-08-16 14:42:22 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Pull-Request has been merged by aggraxis

Pull-Request has been merged by aggraxis
tsobczynski commented 2025-09-14 19:53:22 +00:00
Author
Contributor
Copy link

I'm happy that this tiny contribution was ultimately merged. Thanks much for taking the time to get this into the docs!

I'm happy that this tiny contribution was ultimately merged. Thanks much for taking the time to get this into the docs!
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
Labels
Clear labels   
in progress

   
in progress
Work started

  
meeting
Scheduled for the next SIG meeting

  
need info
Additional information required

  
ongoing work project
Decided working task of the working group

  
on hold
temporarily interrupted

  
pending activity
Work awaiting being taken on

  
release test
test task for the next release

  
user documentation
ongoing work to update and improve documentation

No labels
in progress
in progress
meeting
need info
ongoing work project
on hold
pending activity
release test
user documentation
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
server/user-documentation!106
No description provided.