F26 retrospective #22

Closed
opened 2017-07-13 14:39:54 +00:00 by pfrields · 7 comments

We just went through a GA release. What went well? What didn't go well? Add your issues to this ticket and let's discuss ways to fix them in our next WG meeting.

From my perspective, a couple things went well:

  • Mostly folks were very responsive to bugs, especially some last-minute issues that threatened the release (e.g. pesky gjs/tracker stuff).
  • Good uptake on getting things sorted with Workstation content throughout the cycle

A couple things that need improvement:

  • No one put together a "What's New in F26 Workstation" article for the Magazine. Ryan and I have been doing this in the past but we weren't cued this time and missed it. Would be nice to fix with some sort of scheduled reminder. I can talk to @jkurik about that.
  • The gnome-software background currently is just flat blue, hopefully remedied soon. It would be ideal to figure out a way to automate this so as not to need manual reminding/building/etc. Maybe this could be done with packaging an absolute symlink?
We just went through a GA release. What went well? What didn't go well? Add your issues to this ticket and let's discuss ways to fix them in our next WG meeting. From my perspective, a couple things went well: * Mostly folks were very responsive to bugs, especially some last-minute issues that threatened the release (e.g. pesky gjs/tracker stuff). * Good uptake on getting things sorted with Workstation content throughout the cycle A couple things that need improvement: * No one put together a "What's New in F26 Workstation" article for the Magazine. Ryan and I have been doing this in the past but we weren't cued this time and missed it. Would be nice to fix with some sort of scheduled reminder. I can talk to @jkurik about that. * The gnome-software background currently [is just flat blue](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470727), hopefully remedied soon. It would be ideal to figure out a way to automate this so as not to need manual reminding/building/etc. Maybe this could be done with packaging an absolute symlink?
Author

Metadata Update from @pfrields:

  • Issue tagged with: meeting
**Metadata Update from @pfrields**: - Issue tagged with: meeting
Author

I'm going to hold this ticket open for another week, but we discussed in today's meeting and found some actions to remedy the issues I raised above.

I'm going to hold this ticket open for another week, but we discussed in today's meeting and found some actions to remedy the issues I raised above.
Author

Metadata Update from @pfrields:

  • Issue untagged with: meeting
**Metadata Update from @pfrields**: - Issue **un**tagged with: meeting

The gnome-software background currently is just flat blue, hopefully remedied soon.

Should be fixed in https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-90a307d879 (F24) and https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-abdd43d599 (F25)

> The gnome-software background currently is just flat blue, hopefully remedied soon. Should be fixed in https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-90a307d879 (F24) and https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-abdd43d599 (F25)

No one put together a "What's New in F26 Workstation" article for the Magazine. Ryan and I have been doing this in the past but we weren't cued this time and missed it. Would be nice to fix with some sort of scheduled reminder. I can talk to @jkurik about that.

If there will be a reminder at the day of Beta release to start working on the article, and one more reminder to complete the article sent one week before planned Final GA date, does it fulfil the expectations ?

> No one put together a "What's New in F26 Workstation" article for the Magazine. Ryan and I have been doing this in the past but we weren't cued this time and missed it. Would be nice to fix with some sort of scheduled reminder. I can talk to @jkurik about that. If there will be a reminder at the day of Beta release to start working on the article, and one more reminder to complete the article sent one week before planned Final GA date, does it fulfil the expectations ?
Author

If there will be a reminder at the day of Beta release to start working on the article, and one more reminder to complete the article sent one week before planned Final GA date, does it fulfil the expectations ?

That would be perfect, @jkurik -- thank you!

> If there will be a reminder at the day of Beta release to start working on the article, and one more reminder to complete the article sent one week before planned Final GA date, does it fulfil the expectations ? That would be perfect, @jkurik -- thank you!
Author

Metadata Update from @pfrields:

  • Issue close_status updated to: Fixed
  • Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
**Metadata Update from @pfrields**: - Issue close_status updated to: Fixed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
workstation/tickets#22
No description provided.